Interesting People mailing list archives
worth reading the iab response to an iCANN question re this mess
From: Dave Farber <dave () farber net>
Date: Wed, 17 Sep 2003 13:23:02 -0400
I would consider ICANNs response to this issue to be a very good indicator of their ability to be a guardian of the DNS. If they don't take a strong position, I will read that as yet another bad bad sign.
Dave Date: Wed, 17 Sep 2003 13:08:10 -0400 From: "Adam H. Pendleton" <fmonkey () fmonkey net> To: dave () farber net Dave Farber wrote:
Yes, Verisign has a contract with the United States Department of Commerce. In adition, their actions are overseen, in principle, by the Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers. Currently the DoC is referring all queries to ICANN and Verisign, though they may issue a statement in the next few days. ICANN has said that they *will* be issuing a statement in a few days, and there has already been much internal discussion. See:Doesn't Verisign have some kind of contract with a government body specifying how they are to discharge their trust in running the DNS?
http://www.iab.org/Documents/icann-vgrs-response.html ahp ------------------------------------- You are subscribed as interesting-people () lists elistx com To manage your subscription, go to http://v2.listbox.com/member/?listname=ip Archives at: http://www.interesting-people.org/archives/interesting-people/
Current thread:
- worth reading the iab response to an iCANN question re this mess Dave Farber (Sep 17)