Interesting People mailing list archives
more on Supreme Court Reviews Speech And Library Pornography Fil ters
From: Dave Farber <dave () farber net>
Date: Thu, 06 Mar 2003 09:35:33 -0500
------ Forwarded Message From: "Hitchens, Ralph" <Ralph.Hitchens () hq doe gov> Date: Thu, 06 Mar 2003 08:41:51 -0500 To: "'dave () farber net'" <dave () farber net> Subject: RE: [IP] Supreme Court Reviews Speech And Library Pornography Fil ters Dave -- As a former member of the Montgomery County (MD) Library Board who was involved with the issue of implementing filters on Internet-accessible library computers, I'd like to respond. With all due respect, Mr. Frankston's e-mail reeked of the sort of condescending, detached, academic analysis that presupposes a divide between the common people and the educated elite -- of course "these people" don't understand anything; how could they? We, on the other hand..... My advice is to get down in the trenches, visit a public library, and talk not to the librarians but to the parents. Most of us aren't interested in burning books, but we wonder why the sort of objectionable material that would never be considered by any public library for acqusition in hard copy must be allowed in through the "back door" represented by the Internet, with the preposterous notion that if we fail to do so we are endorsing censorship. I realize that commercially-available filters are far from perfect, but I do think that 1) they're undoubtedly getting better (as are search engines), and 2) the perfect is enemy of the good enough. My county library system elected to install filters on the computers in the children's sections of our libraries only, while exploring the use of privacy screens and other solutions for the unfiltered computers available to the general population. Anyone -- even a minor -- can use one of the unfiltered computers if they so desire. I think this is a fairly responsible and constructive approach, although it falls short of satisfying the the zero-sum anti-censorship activists. The latter remind me of second amendment zealots who see even the mildest constraint on gun ownership as stepping onto a "slippery slope." Ralph Hitchens Poolesville, MD ------ End of Forwarded Message ------------------------------------- You are subscribed as interesting-people () lists elistx com To manage your subscription, go to http://v2.listbox.com/member/?listname=ip Archives at: http://www.interesting-people.org/archives/interesting-people/
Current thread:
- more on Supreme Court Reviews Speech And Library Pornography Fil ters Dave Farber (Mar 06)