Interesting People mailing list archives
More on: Ireland to regulate peering
From: Dave Farber <dave () farber net>
Date: Fri, 20 Jun 2003 10:19:51 -0400
------ Forwarded Message From: Alex French <alex () evilal com> Date: Fri, 20 Jun 2003 15:12:30 +0100 To: Dave Farber <dave () farber net> Cc: iiu () taint org Subject: More on: Ireland to regulate peering Dave et al [Dave, for IP if you like] Thanks to all for the comments on my previous post to IP. Based on the feedback I got from people who know more about this than I do, I'd like to expand & clarify the issues: There are two separate issues here: one is the potential designation of ISPs as having Significant Market Power (SMP); the other is the requirement for ISPs to peer on request. These are separate but linked. On the SMP issue, the EU has issued a directive (2003/311/EC) listing which markets the National Regulatory Authorities (NRAs) should examine for SMP determination. One internet-related market is listed: wholesale DSL. An NRA can look at other markets (such as wholesale peering) only after EU approval (technically, after the EU does not object). A plausible scenario for this is that the Irish NRA receives a number of complaints that a large carrier is refusing to peer and requests approval from the EU to investigate this market. Given the EU's historic concern that large players will abuse their peering power [1], it's likely that the EU would not object. Therefore, due to the way a communications network is defined, the new regulations move ISPs into the category of networks that can be examined for SMP without any further legislation or regulations at the local or EU level, although such regulation is not automatic. Regarding the right to interconnect, I haven't been given any convincing explanations of why my original analysis is incorrect: - ISPs are within the definition of an Electronic Comminucations Network - ISPs are required to register with the NRA as an Authorized Person - Therefore, ISPs must negotiate "interconnect" with any other ECN on request. This is regardless of any SMP obligations. In addition, this obligation applies to every ISP operating within the market, even if they had no intention of offering peering to anyone in this country. Note that this analysis is also supported by at least one UK commentator: [2] states that "It has been argued that the Directive requires that ISP interconnection or peering will be regulated for the first time, and it is difficult not to agree with that view." The biggest threat from this issue is that the definition of an ECN is broad enough to apply to just about every tiny hosting operation with a single PC and a DSL line. There is real fear that large telcos will be reluctant to enter a small market such as Ireland to pursue a couple of large customers when they could potentially be required to peer with every guy with a PC. There are also two potential negative impacts on internet exchanges (IXs). First of all, an IX could no longer refuse to allow an ISP to join, even if they are not a traditional candidate for IX membership. Second, if network X wants to protect itself from regulated peering requests by small ISPs, it can decide not to join any IXs in the country. This will increase the cost to the small ISPs of peering with X (since the cost of the interconnection would probably have to be borne by the access seeker). If NRAs were to uphold the requirement to peer, this could lead to private peering between large ISPs rather than an IX-centric peering model. Finally, I should emphasize that no-one believes that ComReg (the Irish NRA) really wants to regulate the IP peering market. The fear is that once the rules are in place, any ISP could (ab)use the situation by forcing ComReg to enforce peering with another party. Comments continue to be welcome... the deadline for responding to the Irish NRA is next Friday (27 June 2003) so keep 'em coming. Thanks, Alex Notes: [1] See for example this treatment of the MCI/Worldcom merger case: http://216.239.37.100/search?q=cache:hsdXLqy578sJ:www.ciaonet.org/wps/unh01/ &hl=en&lr=lang_en&ie=UTF-8 [2] http://www.legal500.com/devs/uk/it/ukit_126.htm ------ End of Forwarded Message ------------------------------------- You are subscribed as interesting-people () lists elistx com To manage your subscription, go to http://v2.listbox.com/member/?listname=ip Archives at: http://www.interesting-people.org/archives/interesting-people/
Current thread:
- More on: Ireland to regulate peering Dave Farber (Jun 20)