Interesting People mailing list archives
now the "other guys" have justification
From: Dave Farber <dave () farber net>
Date: Fri, 07 Feb 2003 18:16:36 -0500
------ Forwarded Message From: Scott Bradner <sob () harvard edu> Date: Fri, 07 Feb 2003 09:01:58 -0500 (EST) To: dave () farber net Subject: for IP - now the "other guys" have justification http://www.chicagotribune.com/news/nationworld/chi-0302070442feb07,0,7620450 .story?coll=chi-news-hed http://www.chicagotribune.com/news/nationworld/chi-0302070442feb07,0,7620450 .story?coll=chi-news-hed U.S. drafting attack rules for cyber-war By Bradley Graham The Washington Post February 7, 2003 WASHINGTON -- President Bush has signed a secret directive ordering the government to develop, for the first time, guidelines for determining when and how the United States would launch cyber-attacks against enemy computer networks, according to administration officials. Similar to the strategic doctrine on the use of nuclear weapons since World War II, the cyber-warfare effort would establish the rules under which the U.S. would penetrate and disrupt foreign computer systems. The United States has never conducted a large-scale, strategic cyber-attack, several senior officials said. But the Pentagon has stepped up development of cyber-weapons, envisioning a day when electrons might substitute for bombs and allow for more rapid and less bloody attacks on enemy targets. Military planners imagine soldiers at computer terminals silently invading foreign networks to shut down radars, disable electrical facilities and disrupt telephone services. Many specialists say this new form of weaponry has great potential, but until now it has lacked presidential rules for deciding when to launch such attacks, who would authorize and conduct them, and what targets would be considered legitimate. "We have capabilities, we have organizations, we do not yet have an elaborated strategy, doctrine, procedures," said Richard Clarke, who last week quit as Bush's top cyber-security adviser. Bush signed the order, known as National Security Presidential Directive 16, in July. The rules are being prepared amid speculation that the Pentagon is considering offensive computer operations against Iraq if war breaks out over Baghdad's chemical, biological and nuclear weapons development programs. "Whatever might happen in Iraq, you can be assured that all the appropriate approval mechanisms for cyber-operations would be followed," said an administration official who declined elaboration on the plans. The current state of planning for cyber-warfare has frequently been likened to the early years following the invention of the atomic bomb a more than 50 years ago, when thinking about how to wage nuclear war trailed the ability to launch one. In a first move last month to consult with experts from outside government, White House officials helped arrange a meeting at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology that attracted about 50 participants from academia, industry as well as government. The purpose was to consider formation of a cyber-warfare studies association that could help develop a theoretical framework. But a number of participants expressed reservations about the United States engaging in cyber-attacks, arguing that the nation's enormous dependence on computer networks makes it highly vulnerable to counterattack. "There's a lot of inhibition over doing it," said Harvey Sapolsky, an MIT professor who was host at the Jan. 22 session. "A lot of institutions and people are worried about becoming subject to the same kinds of attack in reverse." Copyright © 2003, Chicago Tribune ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Improved archives! Searching Chicagotribune.com archives back to 1985 is cheaper and easier than ever. New prices for multiple articles can bring your cost as low as 30 cents an article: http://chicagotribune.com/archives ------------------------------------- You are subscribed as interesting-people () lists elistx com To unsubscribe or update your address, click http://v2.listbox.com/member/?listname=ip Archives at: http://www.interesting-people.org/archives/interesting-people/
Current thread:
- now the "other guys" have justification Dave Farber (Feb 07)