Interesting People mailing list archives

IP: Ms. Molly Bites the Media That Feeds Her


From: David Farber <dave () farber net>
Date: Mon, 21 Jan 2002 11:57:03 -0500


Date: Sat, 19 Jan 2002 12:24:11 -0800
From: "Janos G." <janos451 () earthlink net>

http://www.prod.dfw.com/mld/startelegram/news/columnists/molly_ivins/2481659
.htm

Star Telegram
Molly Ivins
Jan. 17, 2002

AUSTIN - In New York City last year, about 3,000 people died in the
attack on the World Trade Center. In New York City last year, 30,000
people came to the new federal limits on welfare. Another 19,000 will
lose assistance this year. New York has lost 95,000 jobs since Sept.
11. It lost 75,000 jobs in the year before that. There are now 30,000
people in the city shelters.

Now find the numbers for your town. In Austin, the only organization
that provides help to women with breast cancer and no health
insurance has just cut its staff from 30 to six, with an equal impact
on the help that can be offered. Homelessness is up; shelter
populations are up; food distribution centers and soup kitchens are
overwhelmed.

And all this is happening in a cruel synergy of inattention,
indifference and the final fraying of the social safety net.
Charities are overwhelmed and suddenly vastly underfunded, in large
part as a consequence of the complete focus on the victims of Sept.
11.

The federal government, largely under Republican control, is dealing
with war, terrorism and recession.  State governments, with far less
attention, are out of money, running into deficits and cutting
services across the board. Texas, with another year to go before the
biennial budget battle, is declaring that it can no longer afford its
small share of the federal CHIP - Children's Health Insurance Program.

At the beginning of the 1990s, the states raised their taxes, and
toward the end of the '90s, they cut their taxes. But, as the Center
on Budget and Policy Priorities reports, they didn't cut the same
taxes they had raised.

Commenting on the report, New York Times columnist Paul Krugman
writes: "Increases in regressive taxes - that is, taxes like the
sales tax, which bear most heavily on lower- and moderate-income
families - by and large were never reversed. Instead, states cut
taxes that bear most heavily on upper-income families. The end result
was a redistribution of the tax burden away from the haves toward the
have-nots. A family earning, say, $30,000 per year pays considerably
more in state taxes than a family with the same constant-dollar
income did in 1990, while a family earning $600,000 per year pays
considerably less."

But attention is not being paid. The media, with their One Big Story
obsession, just got off the war in Afghanistan long enough to start
reporting Enron. Networks still devote daily remembrance to the
traumas of Sept. 11, effectively obliterating other needs.

And there is something else happening as well. Thirty-eight percent
of the tax cut of last April went to benefit the wealthiest 1 percent
of taxpayers. We are at a curious point in our political debate where
anyone who points that out is accused of "fomenting class warfare."

Actually, reporting that the wealthiest 1 percent got 38 percent of
the benefits is not fomenting class warfare; passing a tax cut that
gives 38 percent to the wealthiest 1 percent is fomenting class
warfare. Likewise, proposing an "economic stimulus package" of which
92 percent of the benefits are tax cuts for huge corporations is
fomenting class warfare.

And this is a country that needs to be a little nervous about class
warfare as economic pain bites in. There have been some stories
pointing out that this recession is an oddity in that, unlike a
normal recession, it is hitting all classes - largely because of the
dot.com bust. Bright college graduates lose jobs and have to move
back in with Mom and Dad. But that's not the same as the working poor
losing their jobs, is it?

Medicaid, the health insurance program for the poor, is in fiscal
crisis. According to The New York Times, overall Medicaid spending
went up by 11 percent last year, just as the states face huge
deficits.

We live in a society in which the bad stuff flows downhill, and the
people on the bottom are drowning in it.  This is not a story to
which the corporate media pay attention. Bad demographics don't
attract advertisers - not upbeat, no patriotism, too busy with
Russell Crowe's love life.

After six years as governor of Texas, George W. Bush was infuriated
by a federal report ranking Texas No.1 in hunger. "You'd think the
governor would have heard if there are pockets of hunger in Texas,"
he said. Well, Texas had been No. 1 in hunger since the feds started
keeping count in the 1960s. It's a permanent condition here, but the
governor had never seen it.

We better stop, hey, what's that sound

Everybody look what's going down.

~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Janos Gereben/SF
janos451 () earthlink net

~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Janos Gereben/SF
janos451 () earthlink net

For archives see:
http://www.interesting-people.org/archives/interesting-people/


Current thread: