Interesting People mailing list archives
Fw: Re: Fw: Re: IP: Fw: Re: enron bandwith trading
From: David Farber <dfarber () earthlink net>
Date: Sat, 12 Jan 2002 15:08:34 -0400
-----Original Message----- From: "David P. Reed" <dpreed () reed com> Date: Sat, 12 Jan 2002 13:49:46 To: farber () cis upenn edu, ip-sub-1 () majordomo pobox com Subject: Re: Fw: Re: IP: Fw: Re: enron bandwith trading The rationale for bandwidth trading in an open competitive market is to create accurate economic signals (in the form of price changes, which can then fuel options and futures activity) that can be used to guide market investment in new capacity. Otherwise the time constants on investment decisions are too long, and the hidden information dramatically increases the investment risk. This really works in commodity markets with long timing and significant uncontrolled (therefore uncertain) demand. Players who choose to ignore open markets where they exist end up like the "family farmers" who finance their investments entirely with bonds. Ignoring the price signals from futures and options increases the farmer's risk, leading to short-term ruin that can only be saved by government largesse. It's the key reason why agribusinesses can operate on thinner margins without failing. Given that the biggest bottleneck on demand is the "first mile" whose owners completely strangle demand growth to its own ends, it seems to me that bandwidth trading (in backbone capacity) serves little economic purpose. But as a bet on the future opening up of new "first mile" capacity, it wasn't necessarily wrong. Hindsight is 20-20, and when confronting economic uncertainty, it's important to put yourselves in the place of those who made the investment choices, granting them no more than the best information they had at the time. I remember Ed Juge, the head of Tandy-Radio Shack's personal computer division in the early '80's, saying that his experience marketing portable computers demonstrated without a doubt that there would never be demand for battery-powered portable computers - no one would ever want to use a computer on an airplane, for example. A couple of years later, it was impossible to fly on an airplane without seeing several laptops at least. It's absolutely clear to me that bandwidth trading of some sort will be necessary, but I think we will have to wait until the monopolists in the telecom markets lose their government-guaranteed free lunches. (Sent from Dave's Blackberry.) For archives see: http://www.interesting-people.org/archives/interesting-people/
Current thread:
- IP: Fw: Re: enron bandwith trading David Farber (Jan 12)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Fw: Re: IP: Fw: Re: enron bandwith trading David Farber (Jan 12)
- Fw: Re: Fw: Re: IP: Fw: Re: enron bandwith trading David Farber (Jan 12)