Interesting People mailing list archives

IP: War to set up a military presence? from the Independent UK


From: David Farber <dave () farber net>
Date: Tue, 18 Sep 2001 08:31:27 -0400


From: "Michael Gurstein" <mgurst () vcn bc ca>
To: <farber () cis upenn edu>
Subject: Fw: War to set up a military presence?
Date: Tue, 18 Sep 2001 08:19:09 -0400

> INDEPENDENT (London) 18 September 2001
> By Robert Fisk
>
> If Bush wants an invasion, it could become more costly than Vietnam
>
> President Bush is talking about a "crusade"  it would be difficult to find
> a word more likely to enrage Muslims  but if he plans to wage it in
> Afghanistan, the United States faces a military campaign more fraught and
> potentially even more costly than Vietnam.
>
> Ground troops may be necessary to seize Osama bin Laden but they will be
> entering a country containing one tenth of the world's land mines, left by
> Soviet occupation forces across 80 per cent of the land.
>
> Besides, anyone who wants to invade Afghanistan needs friends. The
> Russians had the communist government of Babrak Karmal. But, with the
> murder of the only serious opponent of the Taliban, Shah Masood, by Arab
> suicide bombers nine days ago, the United States hasn't a single friend in
> that cemetery of foreign armies.
>
> So, are the Americans planning a mere attack by cruise missiles? They
> fired 70 missiles at Osama bin Laden's camps after the bombing of the US
> embassies in Nairobi and Dar es Salaam  they knew where they were, of
> course, because the camps were built by the CIA during the Afghan-Russian
> war  but they did not touch Mr bin Laden. Do they plan to use special
> parachute units to descend on the areas around Kandahar where Mr bin Laden
> has been known to live in the past?
>
> And what about those mines? If the Americans are even contemplating a
> ground force, it can enter only from Pakistan  the most dangerous main
> supply route it would be possible to find  and up the Kabul Gorge from
> Jalalabad. But the Russians seeded the perimeters of Jalalabad, Kandahar,
> Khost and Herat with anti-armour mines. There are, in Afghanistan today,
> more than 10 million mines. They lie in fields, on mountainsides, beside
> roads, around the big cities, along irrigation ditches. On average,
> between 20 and 25 Afghan men, women and children are blown up by mines
> every day  even if we take the lower figure, this indicates 73,000
> civilian casualties from these mines in the past 10 years alone.
>
> A military incursion would, therefore, need an army of mine clearance
> specialists as well as soldiers, men who would have to inch their way over
> the roughest terrain in the world  while under attack  to make the roads
> and countryside safe for the Americans and their allies. Of Afghanistan's
> 29 provinces, 27 are littered with mines.
>
> During their savage 10-year occupation, the Russians also planted
> thousands of mines in "security zones" around Afghanistan's airports,
> power stations and government installations. Western non-governmental
> organisations working in the country two years ago estimated that it would
> cost $1 per mine to clear Afghanistan's 10 million mines and 45 days to
> clear merely a square mile of land. There are now two million disabled
> men, women and children in Afghanistan. No infantry can march across this
> territory.
>
> And then there is that main supply route. Pakistan has already made clear
> that it will not involve its own military in a campaign, although there
> are suspicions that enough money might persuade General Musharraf now
> respectfully referred to as President by the Americans even though he took
> the presidency illegally to change his mind. However, the "Jihadi" culture
> has already impregnated the Pakistan army and there is a real possibility
> of unrest turning to civil war if the Americans arrived to invade Muslim
> Afghanistan.
>
> The very border areas through which a Western army would have to pass are
> held by men loyal to the Taliban. On the Pakistani side of the frontier,
> there are now 2,000 Taliban madrassas (schools) where religious teaching
> is given not only to potential mujahedin but to Chechen and Tadjik
> fighters as well.
>
> The policemen who guard these madrassas constitute a mere facade of
> governmental control.
>
> Even if the Americans penetrated Afghanistan, their shells would only
> plough over the ruins. The Russians tried to destroy the Taliban's
> predecessors with 10 years of bombing, destroying whole villages, with
> their people, farm animals, fields, trees and mud huts. And still they
> could not get rid of the mujahedin, still they could not to use Mr Bush's
> inappropriately folksy phrase "smoke them out of their holes".
>
> With Pakistan as its only, broken ally among Afghan-istan's neighbours,
> with no friends inside the country and 10 million hidden land mines lying
> across its mountains and fields and cities, Mr Bush's "crusade" looks more
> than dangerous. We are now being told that the United States is no longer
> afraid to take casualties. America, the President says, will have to
> accept losses. He'd better be right.
>
> ======================
>
> *** NOTICE: In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, this material
> is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest
> in receiving the included information for research and educational
> purposes. Feel free to distribute widely but PLEASE acknowledge the
> original source. ***
>
>
>
>
>



For archives see: http://www.interesting-people.org/


Current thread: