Interesting People mailing list archives
IP: War to set up a military presence? from the Independent UK
From: David Farber <dave () farber net>
Date: Tue, 18 Sep 2001 08:31:27 -0400
From: "Michael Gurstein" <mgurst () vcn bc ca> To: <farber () cis upenn edu> Subject: Fw: War to set up a military presence? Date: Tue, 18 Sep 2001 08:19:09 -0400 > INDEPENDENT (London) 18 September 2001 > By Robert Fisk > > If Bush wants an invasion, it could become more costly than Vietnam > > President Bush is talking about a "crusade" it would be difficult to find > a word more likely to enrage Muslims but if he plans to wage it in > Afghanistan, the United States faces a military campaign more fraught and > potentially even more costly than Vietnam. > > Ground troops may be necessary to seize Osama bin Laden but they will be > entering a country containing one tenth of the world's land mines, left by > Soviet occupation forces across 80 per cent of the land. > > Besides, anyone who wants to invade Afghanistan needs friends. The > Russians had the communist government of Babrak Karmal. But, with the > murder of the only serious opponent of the Taliban, Shah Masood, by Arab > suicide bombers nine days ago, the United States hasn't a single friend in > that cemetery of foreign armies. > > So, are the Americans planning a mere attack by cruise missiles? They > fired 70 missiles at Osama bin Laden's camps after the bombing of the US > embassies in Nairobi and Dar es Salaam they knew where they were, of > course, because the camps were built by the CIA during the Afghan-Russian > war but they did not touch Mr bin Laden. Do they plan to use special > parachute units to descend on the areas around Kandahar where Mr bin Laden > has been known to live in the past? > > And what about those mines? If the Americans are even contemplating a > ground force, it can enter only from Pakistan the most dangerous main > supply route it would be possible to find and up the Kabul Gorge from > Jalalabad. But the Russians seeded the perimeters of Jalalabad, Kandahar, > Khost and Herat with anti-armour mines. There are, in Afghanistan today, > more than 10 million mines. They lie in fields, on mountainsides, beside > roads, around the big cities, along irrigation ditches. On average, > between 20 and 25 Afghan men, women and children are blown up by mines > every day even if we take the lower figure, this indicates 73,000 > civilian casualties from these mines in the past 10 years alone. > > A military incursion would, therefore, need an army of mine clearance > specialists as well as soldiers, men who would have to inch their way over > the roughest terrain in the world while under attack to make the roads > and countryside safe for the Americans and their allies. Of Afghanistan's > 29 provinces, 27 are littered with mines. > > During their savage 10-year occupation, the Russians also planted > thousands of mines in "security zones" around Afghanistan's airports, > power stations and government installations. Western non-governmental > organisations working in the country two years ago estimated that it would > cost $1 per mine to clear Afghanistan's 10 million mines and 45 days to > clear merely a square mile of land. There are now two million disabled > men, women and children in Afghanistan. No infantry can march across this > territory. > > And then there is that main supply route. Pakistan has already made clear > that it will not involve its own military in a campaign, although there > are suspicions that enough money might persuade General Musharraf now > respectfully referred to as President by the Americans even though he took > the presidency illegally to change his mind. However, the "Jihadi" culture > has already impregnated the Pakistan army and there is a real possibility > of unrest turning to civil war if the Americans arrived to invade Muslim > Afghanistan. > > The very border areas through which a Western army would have to pass are > held by men loyal to the Taliban. On the Pakistani side of the frontier, > there are now 2,000 Taliban madrassas (schools) where religious teaching > is given not only to potential mujahedin but to Chechen and Tadjik > fighters as well. > > The policemen who guard these madrassas constitute a mere facade of > governmental control. > > Even if the Americans penetrated Afghanistan, their shells would only > plough over the ruins. The Russians tried to destroy the Taliban's > predecessors with 10 years of bombing, destroying whole villages, with > their people, farm animals, fields, trees and mud huts. And still they > could not get rid of the mujahedin, still they could not to use Mr Bush's > inappropriately folksy phrase "smoke them out of their holes". > > With Pakistan as its only, broken ally among Afghan-istan's neighbours, > with no friends inside the country and 10 million hidden land mines lying > across its mountains and fields and cities, Mr Bush's "crusade" looks more > than dangerous. We are now being told that the United States is no longer > afraid to take casualties. America, the President says, will have to > accept losses. He'd better be right. > > ====================== > > *** NOTICE: In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, this material > is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest > in receiving the included information for research and educational > purposes. Feel free to distribute widely but PLEASE acknowledge the > original source. *** > > > > >
For archives see: http://www.interesting-people.org/
Current thread:
- IP: War to set up a military presence? from the Independent UK David Farber (Sep 18)