Interesting People mailing list archives

IP: 11 September 2001: CRYPTO-GRAM, September 15, 2001


From: David Farber <dave () farber net>
Date: Sat, 15 Sep 2001 16:04:49 -0400

Please note my favorite quotation -- from Ben Franklin djf

Date: Sat, 15 Sep 2001 11:41:36 -0500
To: crypto-gram () chaparraltree com
From: Bruce Schneier <schneier () counterpane com>
Subject: CRYPTO-GRAM, September 15, 2001

                 CRYPTO-GRAM

              September 15, 2001

              by Bruce Schneier
               Founder and CTO
      Counterpane Internet Security, Inc.
           schneier () counterpane com
         <http://www.counterpane.com>


A free monthly newsletter providing summaries, analyses, insights, and commentaries on computer security and cryptography.

Back issues are available at <http://www.counterpane.com/crypto-gram.html>. To subscribe or unsubscribe, see below.


Copyright (c) 2001 by Counterpane Internet Security, Inc.


** *** ***** ******* *********** *************

In this issue:
     11 September 2001
     NSA's Dual Counter Mode
     Corrections and Explanations
     Crypto-Gram Reprints
     News
     Counterpane Internet Security News
     The Doghouse: Shyfile
     New Microsoft Root Certificate Program
     Comments from Readers


** *** ***** ******* *********** *************

           11 September 2001



Both sides of the calendar debate were wrong; the new century began on 11 September 2001.

All day I fielded phone calls from reporters looking for the "computer security angle" to the story. I couldn't find one, although I expect several to come out of the aftermath.

Calls for increased security began immediately. Unfortunately, the quickest and easy way to satisfy those demands is by decreasing liberties. This is always short sighted; real security solutions exist that preserve the free society that we all hold dear, but they're harder to find and require reasoned debate. Strong police forces without Constitutional limitations might appeal to those wanting immediate safety, but the reality is the opposite. Laws that limit police power can increase security, by enforcing honesty, integrity, and fairness. It is our very liberties that make our society as safe as it is.

In times of crisis it's easy to disregard these liberties or, worse, to actively attack them and stigmatize those who support them. We've already seen government proposals for increased wiretapping capabilities and renewed rhetoric about encryption limitations. I fully expect more automatic surveillance of ordinary citizens, limits on information flow and digital-security technologies, and general xenophobia. I do not expect much debate about their actual effectiveness, or their effects on freedom and liberty. It's easier just to react. In 1996, TWA Flight 800 exploded and crashed in the Atlantic. Originally people thought it was a missile attack. The FBI demanded, and Congress passed, a law giving law enforcement greater abilities to expel aliens from the country. Eventually we learned the crash was caused by a mechanical malfunction, but the law still stands.

We live in a world where nation states are not the only institutions which wield power. International bodies, corporations, non-governmental organizations, pan-national ethnicities, and disparate political groups all have the ability to affect the world in an unprecedented manner. As we adjust to this new reality, it is important that we don't become the very forces we abhor. I consider the terrorist attacks on September 11th to be an attack against America's ideals. If our freedoms erode because of those attacks, then the terrorists have won.

The ideals we uphold during a crisis define who we are. Freedom and liberty have a price, and that price is constant vigilance so it not be taken from us in the name of security. Ben Franklin said something that was often repeated during the American Revolutionary War: "They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety." It is no less true today.


Senate Amendment 1562, adopted Thursday, will expand Federal wiretapping powers:
<http://www.cdt.org/security/091101response.shtml/>

Calls to ban encryption:
<http://www.wired.com/news/politics/0,1283,46816,00.html>
<http://www.msnbc.com/news/627390.asp>

Re-emergence of Carnivore:
<http://www.wired.com/news/politics/0,1283,46747,00.html>
<http://latimes.com/business/la-000073542sep12.story>

Erosions of civil liberties are coming:
<http://www.wired.com/news/politics/0,1283,46784,00.html>

Other essays:
<http://www.crypto.com/wtc.html>
<http://groups.yahoo.com/group/wtcattack/message/93>
<http://www.cdt.org/security/cdtstatement.shtml>

"Americans must rethink how to safeguard the country without bartering away the rights and privileges of the free society that we are defending. The temptation will be great in the days ahead to write draconian new laws that give law enforcement agencies - or even military forces - a right to undermine the civil liberties that shape the character of the United States. President Bush and Congress must carefully balance the need for heightened security with the need to protect the constitutional rights of Americans."
            - The New York Times, 12 Sep 01

"Our values, our resolve, our commitment, our sense of community will serve us well. I am confident that, as a nation, we will seek and serve justice. Our Nation, my neighbors and friends in Vermont demand no less, but we must not let the terrorists win. If we abandon our democracy to battle them, they win. If we forget our role as the world's leader to defeat them, they win. And we will win. We will maintain our democracy, and with justice, we will use our strength."
            - Sen. Patrick Leahy, 12 Sep 01

"History teaches that grave threats to liberty often come in times of urgency, when constitutional rights seem too extravagant to endure."
            - Justice Thurgood Marshall, 1989

<big snip>



For archives see: http://www.interesting-people.org/


Current thread: