Interesting People mailing list archives

IP: Foreign Policy: Rational Fanatics


From: David Farber <dave () farber net>
Date: Thu, 13 Sep 2001 05:43:54 -0400



Date: Thu, 13 Sep 2001 04:17:38 -0400
From: "Robert J. Berger" <rberger () ultradevices com>
To: Dave Farber <farber () cis upenn edu>

Rational Fanatics

What makes suicide bombers tick? While most of the world sees them as
lone zealots, they are, in fact, pawns of large terrorist networks
that wage calculated psychological warfare.  Contrary to popular
belief, suicide bombers can be stopped-but only if governments pay
more attention to their methods and motivations.

By Ehud Sprinzak
http://www.foreignpolicy.com/issue_SeptOct_2001/sprinzak.html

October 23, 1983, was one of the most horrific days in the history of
modern terrorism. Two massive explosions destroyed the barracks of the
U.S. and French contingents of the multinational peacekeeping force in
Beirut, Lebanon, killing 241 American servicemen and 58 French
paratroopers. Both explosions were carried out by Muslim extremists
who drove to the heart of the target area and detonated bombs with no
intention of escaping.  Subsequent suicide attacks against Israeli and
U.S. targets in Lebanon and Kuwait made it clear that a new type of
killing had entered the repertoire of modern terrorism: a suicide
operation in which the success of the attack depends on the death of
the perpetrator.

This tactic stunned security experts. Two centuries of experience
suggested that terrorists, though ready to risk their lives, wished to
live after the terrorist act in order to benefit from its
accomplishments. But this new terrorism defied that belief. It seemed
qualitatively different, appearing almost supernatural, extremely
lethal, and impossible to stop. Within six months, French and
U.S. Presidents Frangois Mitterrand and Ronald Reagan pulled their
troops out of Lebanon-a tacit admission that the new terrorism
rendered all known counterterrorist measures useless. Government
officials erected concrete barriers around the White House and sealed
the Pentagon's underground bus tunnels. Nobody was reassured. As Time
magazine skeptically observed in 1983: "No security expert thinks such
defensive measures will stop a determined Islamic terrorist who
expects to join Allah by killing some Americans."

Whereas the press lost no time in labeling these bombers irrational
zealots, terrorism specialists offered a more nuanced appraisal,

<snip>



For archives see: http://www.interesting-people.org/


Current thread: