Interesting People mailing list archives
IP: Foreign Policy: Rational Fanatics
From: David Farber <dave () farber net>
Date: Thu, 13 Sep 2001 05:43:54 -0400
Date: Thu, 13 Sep 2001 04:17:38 -0400 From: "Robert J. Berger" <rberger () ultradevices com> To: Dave Farber <farber () cis upenn edu> Rational Fanatics What makes suicide bombers tick? While most of the world sees them as lone zealots, they are, in fact, pawns of large terrorist networks that wage calculated psychological warfare. Contrary to popular belief, suicide bombers can be stopped-but only if governments pay more attention to their methods and motivations. By Ehud Sprinzak http://www.foreignpolicy.com/issue_SeptOct_2001/sprinzak.html October 23, 1983, was one of the most horrific days in the history of modern terrorism. Two massive explosions destroyed the barracks of the U.S. and French contingents of the multinational peacekeeping force in Beirut, Lebanon, killing 241 American servicemen and 58 French paratroopers. Both explosions were carried out by Muslim extremists who drove to the heart of the target area and detonated bombs with no intention of escaping. Subsequent suicide attacks against Israeli and U.S. targets in Lebanon and Kuwait made it clear that a new type of killing had entered the repertoire of modern terrorism: a suicide operation in which the success of the attack depends on the death of the perpetrator. This tactic stunned security experts. Two centuries of experience suggested that terrorists, though ready to risk their lives, wished to live after the terrorist act in order to benefit from its accomplishments. But this new terrorism defied that belief. It seemed qualitatively different, appearing almost supernatural, extremely lethal, and impossible to stop. Within six months, French and U.S. Presidents Frangois Mitterrand and Ronald Reagan pulled their troops out of Lebanon-a tacit admission that the new terrorism rendered all known counterterrorist measures useless. Government officials erected concrete barriers around the White House and sealed the Pentagon's underground bus tunnels. Nobody was reassured. As Time magazine skeptically observed in 1983: "No security expert thinks such defensive measures will stop a determined Islamic terrorist who expects to join Allah by killing some Americans." Whereas the press lost no time in labeling these bombers irrational zealots, terrorism specialists offered a more nuanced appraisal,
<snip> For archives see: http://www.interesting-people.org/
Current thread:
- IP: Foreign Policy: Rational Fanatics David Farber (Sep 13)