Interesting People mailing list archives
IP: RE: AISPA Weekly: Intel and Broadband Deregulation
From: David Farber <dave () farber net>
Date: Tue, 30 Oct 2001 10:50:25 -0500
From: Dewayne Hendricks <dewayne () warpspeed com> [Note: This comment comes from reader Chuck Jackson. DLH] At 5:20 -0800 10/30/01, Charles L. Jackson wrote:From: "Charles L. Jackson" <chuck () jacksons net> To: <dewayne () warpspeed com> Subject: RE: AISPA Weekly: Intel and Broadband Deregulation Date: Tue, 30 Oct 2001 05:20:20 -0800 MIME-Version: 1.0 Earlier someone asked:>I wonder if Peter Pitsch really represents Intel's views on Telecom >"deregulation". Previously they were one of the main proponents of >the Telecom Act and fostering competition...Here is the summary of Intel's recent filing at the FCC in the 706 proceeding. It appears to me that Pitsch does represent Intel. Before the FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Washington, D.C. 20554 In the Matter of ) ) Inquiry Concerning the Deployment of ) Advanced Telecommunications ) Capability to All Americans in a Reasonable ) CC Docket No. 98-146 And Timely Fashion, and Possible Steps ) To Accelerate Such Deployment ) Pursuant to Section 706 of the ) Telecommunications Act of 1996 ) COMMENTS OF INTEL CORPORATION ______________________ SummaryIntel Corporation is pleased to comment on this Inquiry concerning thedeployment of advanced telecommunications capability. Intel believes that current regulations are unnecessarily undermining the reasonable and timely deployment of broadband and, therefore, the Federal Communications Commission (the Commission) should begin a comprehensive Section 706 rulemaking to review the regulations that apply to all broadband providers.Under Section 706(a) of the Telecommunications Act of 1996, the Commissionis obligated to promote the reasonable and timely deployment of broadband through a variety of regulatory tools. Since "advanced telecommunications capability" includes the ability to transmit and receive video, the Commission's analysis of the status of deployment should consider the availability of high-bandwidth broadband, which is necessary for video content.Given the importance of video-rich applications to the development andgrowth of broadband deployment, the Commission's Section 706 analysis needs to consider the availability of affordable, high-bandwidth broadband to a critical mass of U.S. households in the near term. In particular, the Commission should consider whether multiple providers are deploying advanced telecommunications capability at speeds in excess of 6 Mbps to a majority of U.S. households by the end of 2002.Despite the potential benefit of widespread, affordable broadband, recentevidence suggests that both the deployment and consumer acceptance of current generation broadband is low and slowing. Even more important, DSL providers have reached an inflection point where they must decide whether to the make substantial new investments in their facilities that would make higher-speed access widely available in the near future. The current broadband market is competitive and risky, due to reduced access to capital and competing technologies such as cable modem, DSL, satellite, wireless, and dial-up access. Moreover, many financial analysts conclude that the current regulatory climate is further limiting broadband deployment due to infrastructure investment disincentives. Therefore, Intel believes that the Commission should begin a comprehensive Section 706 rulemaking to review the regulations that apply to all broadband providers in order to encourage the risky and expensive investment in broadband facilities needed to bring high-bandwidth broadband access to the home. Tentatively, the Commission should propose deregulating all new, last mile broadband investment to encourage the fastest possible deployment of the highest speed technology.
For archives see: http://www.interesting-people.org/archives/interesting-people/
Current thread:
- IP: RE: AISPA Weekly: Intel and Broadband Deregulation David Farber (Oct 30)