Interesting People mailing list archives

IP: RE: AISPA Weekly: Intel and Broadband Deregulation


From: David Farber <dave () farber net>
Date: Tue, 30 Oct 2001 10:50:25 -0500


From: Dewayne Hendricks <dewayne () warpspeed com>
[Note:  This comment comes from reader Chuck Jackson.  DLH]

At 5:20 -0800 10/30/01, Charles L. Jackson wrote:
From: "Charles L. Jackson" <chuck () jacksons net>
To: <dewayne () warpspeed com>
Subject: RE: AISPA Weekly: Intel and Broadband Deregulation
Date: Tue, 30 Oct 2001 05:20:20 -0800
MIME-Version: 1.0

Earlier someone asked:


 >I wonder if Peter Pitsch really represents Intel's views on Telecom
 >"deregulation". Previously they were one of the main proponents of
 >the Telecom Act and fostering competition...

Here is the summary of Intel's recent filing at the FCC in the 706
proceeding.  It appears to me that Pitsch does represent Intel.

Before the
FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20554

In the Matter of                                                )
                                                                )
Inquiry Concerning the Deployment of            )
Advanced Telecommunications                             )
Capability to All Americans in a Reasonable     )       CC Docket No. 98-146
And Timely Fashion, and Possible Steps          )
To Accelerate Such Deployment                           )
Pursuant to Section 706 of the                  )
Telecommunications Act of 1996                  )

COMMENTS OF INTEL CORPORATION

______________________

Summary
Intel Corporation is pleased to comment on this Inquiry concerning the
deployment of advanced telecommunications capability. Intel believes that
current regulations are unnecessarily undermining the reasonable and timely
deployment of broadband and, therefore, the Federal Communications
Commission (the Commission) should begin a comprehensive Section 706
rulemaking to review the regulations that apply to all broadband providers.
Under Section 706(a) of the Telecommunications Act of 1996, the Commission
is obligated to promote the reasonable and timely deployment of broadband
through a variety of regulatory tools.   Since "advanced telecommunications
capability" includes the ability to transmit and receive video, the
Commission's analysis of the status of deployment should consider the
availability of high-bandwidth broadband, which is necessary for video
content.
Given the importance of video-rich applications to the development and
growth of broadband deployment, the Commission's Section 706 analysis needs
to consider the availability of affordable, high-bandwidth broadband to a
critical mass of U.S. households in the near term. In particular, the
Commission should consider whether multiple providers are deploying advanced
telecommunications capability at speeds in excess of 6 Mbps to a majority of
U.S. households by the end of 2002.
Despite the potential benefit of widespread, affordable broadband, recent
evidence suggests that both the deployment and consumer acceptance of
current generation broadband is low and slowing. Even more important, DSL
providers have reached an inflection point where they must decide whether to
the make substantial new investments in their facilities that would make
higher-speed access widely available in the near future.
The current broadband market is competitive and risky, due to reduced access
to capital and competing technologies such as cable modem, DSL, satellite,
wireless, and dial-up access. Moreover, many financial analysts conclude
that the current regulatory climate is further limiting broadband deployment
due to infrastructure investment disincentives.
Therefore, Intel believes that the Commission should begin a comprehensive
Section 706 rulemaking to review the regulations that apply to all broadband
providers in order to encourage the risky and expensive investment in
broadband facilities needed to bring high-bandwidth broadband access to the
home. Tentatively, the Commission should propose deregulating all new, last
mile broadband investment to encourage the fastest possible deployment of
the highest speed technology.



For archives see:
http://www.interesting-people.org/archives/interesting-people/


Current thread: