Interesting People mailing list archives

IP: The thermodynamics of terrorism


From: David Farber <dave () farber net>
Date: Tue, 23 Oct 2001 11:50:13 -0400


Jim is the Dean of the School of Computer Science at CMU



Date: Tue, 23 Oct 2001 11:22:14 -0400
To: farber () cis upenn edu
From: "James H. Morris" <james.morris () cmu edu>

The 9/11/01 attack reminds me of the demonstrations in which knocking over one domino results is thousands of dominos falling. They spent only half a million dollars to destroy billions in physical assets and even more in market losses. A strategic planning manual for a terrorist might say, "Attack a point in your enemy's system with high potential energy and low entropy. Those are the areas where a small perturbation can cause the most havoc." The counter strategy for our society is "Don't build such systems. Avoid single points of failure. Decentralize and disperse control."

Here are some examples of systems that follow the principle of high-entropy design compared to their more vulnerable alternatives:
  The Internet instead of the phone system.
NASDAQ instead of the NYSE with its trading floor, useful only for photo-ops.
  Gnutella et al. instead of Napster.
Air transport that uses thousands of small air taxis rather than today's hub-and-spoke system (James Fallows) A competitive, heterogeneous operating system market instead of a monoclonal Microsoft one.
  Al Qaeda instead of the CIA.
  A dispersed population instead of mega-cities.

Adoption of such systems will occur naturally because they survive better. They will depend upon increasing commitment to computer and communications technology. So cyber-security will eventually be central to all security.

There are ways to fight terrorism more directly, but designing robust infrastructure should not be ignored.






James H. Morris
Dean, School of Computer Science
412 609-5000
http://www.cs.cmu.edu/~jhm



For archives see:
http://www.interesting-people.org/archives/interesting-people/


Current thread: