Interesting People mailing list archives
IP: Science on Energy
From: David Farber <dave () farber net>
Date: Tue, 26 Jun 2001 19:04:38 -0400
From: Bruce R Koball <bkoball () well com> Dave, Regarding your query:I am trying to make sense out of what appear to be outrageous estimates that computers and networks and their power consumption is one of the causes of the national power shortage. In 1999, Mark P. Mills published a report for the Greening Earth Society (summarized in an article in Forbes Magazine) that attempted to calculate the "Internet related" portion of electricity use. This report claimed that electricity use associated with the Internet totaled about 8 percent of all U.S. electricity use in 1998 and that it would grow to half of all electricity use in the next decade. Can an IPer help either confirm or deny such claims. To me it does not compute.See the following from Science magazine:Good news for Californians: You may be able to keep pecking away at the keyboard without feeling guilty about the energy crisis. A new study from Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory in California estimates that computer and Internet use is sucking up much less power than some have claimed. In 1999, Mark Mills stoked up the debate with a study done for a group, the Greening Earth Society, that believes carbon dioxide emissions are good for human welfare. Mills asserted, among other things, that every time someone orders a book from Amazon.com, the transaction burns up the equivalent of about 225 grams of coal. He said the Internet accounts for about 8% of U.S. power use, and that "1 billion PCs on the World Wide Web"--as predicted by Intel for 2004--would create a global electricity demand equal to total current U.S. consumption.* The Environmental Protection Agency asked the Berkeley lab to evaluate Mills's claims. So a group headed by Jonathan Koomey of the Energy End-Use Forecasting Group has produced an estimate of energy use by all U.S. computerized office equipment.** The total, they aver--and that includes non-Internet activity--would be no more than 74 terawatt-hours per year, or 2% of total U.S. electricity use. They also say, in an unpublished paper, that Mills's estimate of a typical PC's power consumption of 1000 watts is way overboard: The reality is closer to 150 watts. * http://www.networkmagazine.com/article/NMG20010103S0005/1 ** http://enduse.lbl.gov/Projects/InfoTech.html --"Science" 2001 February 23; 291: 1453 (in NetWatch)-brk- Bruce R. Koball B. R. Koball, Inc. (direct) 510 845-1350 bkoball () well com 2210 Sixth St (office) 510 548-2450 "No Compromised Keys!" Berkeley, CA 94710 (fax) 510 845-3946
For archives see: http://www.interesting-people.org/
Current thread:
- IP: Science on Energy David Farber (Jun 26)