Interesting People mailing list archives
IP: Note to Boston Globe
From: Dave Farber <farber () cis upenn edu>
Date: Tue, 27 Jan 1998 15:25:32 -0500
Jock is a long time friend of the President and thus he MAY have a bias but in this case I think he hit it right on the button. Our democracy is in danger of becoming a soap opera. Dave Date: Tue, 27 Jan 1998 08:52:03 -0500 From: jgill <jgill () penfield-gill com> Friends, Here is the text of a note I sent this morning to two friends in the Washington bureau of the Boston Globe: David Shribman & Michael Kranish. Please let me know what you think. Regards, Jock --------- note to Globe -------------- David, I enjoyed the lead editorial in today's paper -- but it did not go far enough. The Globe writes in 'What Next': If Clinton is telling the truth ... then the nation ... owes itself a stern examination of the roles of the special prosecutor, the press, and public opinion generally. While this is all true, I urge you to write on why this would be important. What is at stake for the nation? The Globe needs to take the next step and lead the harder discussion. There is the perspective that we have currently degenerated to government by soap opera and justice by a revolutionary tribunal lead by Ken Starr. Not a pretty picture. The leaks coming from Starr's organization are a scandal. The press rushes to publish them for profit but not to challenge their legitimacy or the ethics of Starr for allowing it. The President is entitled to due process like any citizen. If the President is not entitled to due process, then any politician, and thus every American, is vulnerable to terrorist media tactics - whether they be intentional or the result of manipulation. Imagine the threat to liberty. The press today looks as if it is being used as a terroristic weapon. Their process creates a de facto attack on due process as well as a enflamed lynch mob. The source of this abuse is worthy of investigation as it attacks the heart of American democracy. There are interesting questions to be asked concerning the coercion of witnesses/participants, entrapment, subversion of friendship, and the doctrine of the fruit of the poisoned tree. All of these relate to the corrosive attack on due process. Does the press have any responsibility to moderate the howlings of the lynch mob in their feeding frenzy? Or is the only proper free market role of the press to throw rotten chum from dubious sources into the bloody waters? What if the press were fanning the flames of a mob eager to lynch a member of a minority? Do we honor the press that backed the depravations of the KKK or the excesses of the Nazis? My view is that the press has a higher duty which transcends the values of the financial market place. The press must assume, in our instant hypermedia world, the role of the graphite rods in a nuclear reactor: moderators of the destructive nuclear process to prevent melt down and explosion. The press has the power to put time back into the process and save us from the tyranny of the majority mob as well as from the evils of government by plebiscite. After all, who has historically elected to govern by plebiscite? Dictators who wish the mantle of legitimacy via an easily manipulates populace. Is this the future we wish for America? What sort of country do we want? This is the key question today's editorial did not ask. Do we want a society where liberty, trust, friendship and due process flourish? Or do we want to demolish due process, destroy trust and lead friends to rat on friends and parents to turn in their children? We have only to look at countries such as the former Evil Empire, Nazi Germany, Pol Pot's Cambodia, and China's Red Guards, to name but a few of the worst offenders, to see what life is like where trust is dead, due process is forgotten and friends are dangerous. Is this what the current set of attackers wish for America? I look forward to hearing from you. Regards, Jock -- ____________________________________________________________________ Jock Gill jgill () penfield-gill com www.penfield-gill.com ____________________________________________________________________
Current thread:
- IP: Note to Boston Globe Dave Farber (Jan 27)