Interesting People mailing list archives
IP: Government and Cryptography, revisited
From: David Farber <farber () cis upenn edu>
Date: Mon, 15 Sep 1997 15:56:12 -0400
Date: Mon, 15 Sep 1997 12:19:34 -0700 (PDT) From: George Dyson <gdyson () cc wwu edu> To: David Farber <farber () cis upenn edu> Subject: Government and Cryptography, revisited David Farber: Bishop (John) Wilkins (1614-1672) will be preaching to the converted here, but perhaps some of your readers may find his words encouraging (356 years later) as they hold their ground against another bid for government control. In his treatise on cryptography and telecommunications (*Mercury, or the Secret and Swift messenger, shewing how a man may with privacy and speed Communicate his thoughts to a Friend at any distance*, London, 1641, pp. 179-180) Wilkins addressed the question of whether the powers of cryptography should be reserved for the Government, or made publicly available to all: "If it be feared that this Discourse may unhappily advantage others, in such unlawfull courses: Tis considerable, that it does not only teach how to deceive, but consequently also how to discover Delusions. And then besides, the chiefe experiments are of such nature, that they cannot be frequently practiced, without just cause of suspicion, when as it is in the Magistrates power to prevent them. However, it will not follow, that every thing must be supprest, which may bee abused... If all those usefull inventions that are lyable to abuse, should therefore be concealed, there is not any Art or Science, which might be lawfully professed." Best wishes. George B. Dyson gdyson () cc wwu edu ________________________________________________________________________
Current thread:
- IP: Government and Cryptography, revisited David Farber (Sep 15)