Interesting People mailing list archives
FYI: letter to Business Week editor or how soon they forget
From: David Farber <farber () cis upenn edu>
Date: Fri, 30 May 1997 13:55:15 -0400
To: David Farber <farber () cis upenn edu> From: Sharon Eisner Gillett <sharoneg () victory-research com> David, Thought you would want to see the letter below that I just sent to the editors of BW: **** I was dismayed to find factual errors and shallow analysis, uncharacteristic of your fine magazine, in your May 26 story, "What Price Science?" The article claims, for example, that Intel "came up blank" when asked for examples of how basic research paid off for them. Huh? Perhaps the answer is just too obvious: Intel's entire business, microchips, would not exist today without the invention of the transistor -- a product of basic research. Further, the article states that the Internet was developed without much basic research. In fact, the National Science Foundation's role as Internet "matchmaker" in the mid-1980's was only possible because of technologies and competencies developed during the preceding decade through basic research programs, in particular those funded by the Advanced Research Projects Agency of the U.S. Department of Defense. In the debate over efficiency, let us not lose commitment to this key point of consensus: by any measure, the societal ROI from basic research is immense. Sharon Eisner Gillett Principal, Victory Research, and Research Affiliate, MIT Sloan School of Management **** Here's the Internet-specific part of the article that I'm referring to: "A research team led by Georgia Tech's Roessner found that in three cases--reaction injection molding (used in plastics manufacture), magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), and the Internet -- new technology did not flow directly from breakthroughs in basic science. In developing the Internet, for instance, the National Science Foundation played the role of matchmaker, putting together diverse collections of people and technologies without spending much on actual research." I would be curious to know what the GT study actually says. OK to send this to IP if you deem appropriate. Regards, Sharon -------------------------------------------------------------------- Sharon Eisner Gillett, sharoneg () victory-research com, (617) 253-3865 Research Affiliate, Center for Coordination Science, E40-181 MIT Sloan School of Management, One Amherst Street Cambridge, MA 02139 USA --------------------------------------------------------------------
Current thread:
- FYI: letter to Business Week editor or how soon they forget David Farber (May 30)