Interesting People mailing list archives
IP: The Telecosm's Last Dream from Silicon Alley Newsletter
From: David Farber <farber () cis upenn edu>
Date: Mon, 25 Aug 1997 17:29:26 -0400
From: Tom Watson <tom () siliconalleynews com> Subject: newsletter Dave Sure, you can post our stuff--we'd like you to include our url -- http://www.siliconalleynews.com -- and make sure folks know they can subscribe for free. Tom ===================================================== TOM WATSON -+- Editor & Publisher, @NY ______________________________________________________________ The Telecosm's Last Dream EDITOR'S NOTE -- For those of you who missed it, Forbes Magazine, in its subscription-only publication Forbes ASAP, ran a huge content package this month consisting of a string of relentless rip jobs on the culture, cuisine, climate, and yes, new media industry East of the Rockies--especially here in New York. (How can you defend the climate in San Francisco if you've ever been to a baseball game at Candlestick, er, 3Com Park where outfielders literally wear wetsuits under their uniforms to stay warm?) The tone shouldn't surprise anyone. Forbes has always been a haven for crotchety, "whatever-it-is-I'm-against-it," knee-jerk, ideological ranting and raving masquerading as journalism. Gary Poole's piece, "Dream On, Silicon Alley," is no different. It's characterized by what we consider lazy journalism and sloppy logic, an opinion we already expressed to Poole privately. Poole's piece is predicated on a comparison between New York's new media industry and Silicon Valley's software and microchip industries, a comparison that is a misfire from the get-go. New York's new media revolution is not about inventing technology but about inventing modes of expression that use technology. Howard Stern didn't invent the radio, but he sure made listening to the radio a different experience for Americans. Venture capitalists might invest in a radio company like Westinghouse, but wouldn't invest in a show like Stern's or Rush Limbaugh's--it's just not a venture play. But radio companies would be nearly valueless without the Sterns or Limbaughs of the world. It's the difference between media and technology and it seems to have eluded Forbes. The strange thing about the Forbes ASAP special issue rip job on the East (entitled "How the West Kicked Butt") seems to be its timing. Why in the summer of 1997 would Forbes issue a broadside that rips MIT, New Yorkers' work habits, Silicon Alley, and hotel service in Boston with absolutely no news peg in sight? A cynical media observer might chalk it up to the difficulty magazines have filling pages during the summer months. But our guest editorial writer this week posits a different idea. To Mark Stahlman, the co-founder of the New York New Media Association, the Forbes ASAP package is the opening salvo in a war between the West Coast techno-utopians and East Coast cyber populists, or realists, to use Stahlman's term. Read on and tell us what you think: By Mark Stahlman East vs. West. Content vs. Technology. Silly vs. Stupid. Sound familiar? How about Realists vs. Utopians? Yes, I'm talking about politics and I'm talking about economics. Real life. Nothing at all virtual about this. Atoms, not bits. For those of you who haven't yet seen the current Forbes ASAP cover story on how the West has kicked the East's butt, it's a real laugh-riot. It's drive-by journalism. It's the techbiz-press equivalent of John-John's fabricated feud with his cousins and his nudie photo-op in George. It's . . . well . . . a joke. Or, is it? Forbes ASAP was founded by business writer and economist George Gilder, a former speech writer for Richard Nixon and author of Wealth & Poverty, a supply side economic tract dating from the first Reagan administration. You might know Gilder. In the 1990s he became that guru of cyber-libertarianism who brought us a redefinition of the word "microcosm"(which to Gilder refers to the microelectric world that lives on the surface of a semiconductor). You might have heard Gilder's references to the "telecosm", a catch-all description of the internetworked world, an idea developed by Gilder for the Seattle-based cyberlibertarian think tank The Discovery Institute. You might say that Gilder's the Carl Sagan of cyberspace. "Billions and billions . . ." But, maybe you didn't hear him say the following in a promotional write-up for his keynote speech, "Revolt Against the Telecosm," at the upcoming (September 14-16) Gilder/Forbes invite-only ($3800) "Telecosm" conference in Palm Springs: "Beyond the usual ohms of practical executives, the new paradigm of the net aroused the resistance of the usual suspects. With the Internet emerging as the central nervous system of global capitalism, the Luddite left burst into 'flames' against the microcosm and telecosm . . . pseudoeconomists prattle endlessly about the growing gap between the 'information rich' and the 'information poor' . . . according to the critics' predictions, [the Internet] will collapse, clogged with traffic and polluted with porn and violence." Hmmm, now we're getting somewhere. George is upset. Apparently, so is Rich Karlgaard, his editor at Forbes ASAP, which is why he commissioned the missed-all-the-obvious-points-mugging on the current cover of ASAP. They are upset that everyone isn't buying into their cyber-libertarian utopian dream. They are upset that what they call the "Luddite left" (whatever that is) has started to raise some major objections to the bonanza of oligopolistic looting they have been falsely sugar-coating with promises of boundless prosperity. They are upset that their "revolution" isn't working out as planned. And, they blame New York and everything East of the Berserkley Hills for their frustration and, yes, their confusion about the nightmare they have helped to create. I wonder if they understood Tom Wolfe's brilliant anti-Gilder essay "Sorry, but Your Soul Just Died" in last December's ASAP. Maybe they're still mad about that too. Economic Libertarianism (the modern credo hatched largely by Nobel-winning economist Frederick von Hayek) is in trouble because, in economic terms, this stuff simply doesn't work as advertised. Deregulation of telecommunications -- significantly underpinned by libertarian lobbyists and think-tankers like Gilder and fellow conference speaker Peter Huber of conservative think tank The Manhattan Institute -- has only produced more market concentration, more layoffs, more million dollar bonuses and more TV channels. Not innovation, not progress and not competition -- as was claimed. Reality has a way of making some people angry. They need to find people to blame for the errors of their own fervid imaginations. So, naturally, they pick on New York. Yes, this is the Gilder who once argued we don't need cities anymore. Gilder's pal Mike Milken will be giving a keynote in Palm Springs called, stunningly, "The Predators Ball." Fitting, since Gilder keynoted the real "Ball" until those nasty Feds stepped in and put Mike behind bars. Milken will also be moderating the final "special address" called, prophetically, "The 20th Century is Over." Here's how Gilder sets this one up: "It will be seen that science, technology, and capitalism all stand interdependently on the same moral foundations. With the unleashing of a global spiral of growth and progress, a new cultural era is at hand. . . . The true vision of the 21st Century will become prevalent in a rich and expansive culture, spread around the globe by the Internet." Nice thoughts. Good sentence structure. Total utopian hogwash. Realists know better. The end of the nation-state, the political cornerstone of Gilder et al's politics could only yield a brutal oligarchist imperial struggle and wholesale depopulation of the planet. What cyber-geopolitician Michael Vlahos called "The Big Change," will in his estimation produce a wretched underclass comprising 25-percent of America's citizens -- which he glibly refers to as "the Lost." Far from a "global boom," the libertarian political-economics of Gilder/ASAP would much more likely usher in a New Dark Age of death, misery and ignorance. If we let it happen, that is. Reality has a way of imposing itself on dreamer's virtual worlds. But, the same George Gilder who yearns for "the overthrow of matter" isn't quite ready for Level Above Human yet. Let's make sure that the realists figure out what's going on and take charge of this mess or we'll all be meeting on the comet's tail before long. Dream on, telecosmos dwellers. Dream on. Reality approaches. What Do You Think?
Current thread:
- IP: The Telecosm's Last Dream from Silicon Alley Newsletter David Farber (Aug 25)