Interesting People mailing list archives
International Forum on Multimedia - brief/rough notes (from an IPer)
From: Dave Farber <farber () central cis upenn edu>
Date: Wed, 31 May 1995 18:32:32 +0900
"The International Forum on Multimedia - Toward a Multimedia Society in the 21st Century: Asia and the World", Thursday (May 25), Takanawa Prince Hotel, Tokyo. I only caught little over half of the afternoon session, some rough notes follow, editorial type comments in [...] Adam I arrived towards the end of Mike Nelson's presentation, as I sat down he was talking about network commerce on the GII and some of the challenges and implications: taxes and customs duties, how are they to be paid on "goods" traveling over the global network? The administration do not want network owners to control content and restrict access to information. Important point for Gore. They want to avoid a repeat of the cable TV situation in the US where operators decide what programming is available. Importance of 2 way networks. Said he'd seen some wonderful systems, really great potential, but they were all gigabit's in and only a few K back for the remote control to change channels or send the "buy" command. The administration believes in the two-way nature of the network, the balance of in and back channels. Competition in communications: the goal is an industry as open and competitive as today's computer industry. Working with Congress now to try and ensure that this level of competition is introduced to the communications industry. Evolution of the information superhighway, from the arrival of computers (20 years ago), getting them connected over networks (the last ten years), communities developing on those networks (in the last few years, first academics, then peer groups and business), and the most recent stage is commerce. Though I missed most of this session, seemed like a very up-beat presentation. "Toward a new framework for International Cooperation". Panel discussion. Chairman: Tekemochi Ishii, Keio University, Environmental Information. Panel: George Yeo, Singapore, Minister for Information & Arts & Health [censorship comes under his ministry] Lee Yong Kyung, Korea Telecom, VP for R&D Mike Nelson, US. Jack Matthey, Member of the cabinet of Edith Cresson [EU commissioner for information technology - I think] Akemi Yamaguchi, Communications Policy Bureau, MPT, Japan Person from Thailand's telco. Singapore Yeo began. [I was told by a friend who'd attended Yeo's main presentation earlier in the day that he'd made a few general comments against US info policy/the US in general. Example, Yeo compared the reaction of Japanese and US societies to recent earthquakes. After Kobe, the Japanese government just got on with the job of re-building. After the LA earthquake, the US people looted. He seemed to direct many of his comments during the panel at Mike Nelson.] One of the goals of the IT2000 plan was to position Singapore as the information hub for Asia. Singapore could not take a wait and see role, to continue as a trading nation they must embrace information technology quickly. Yeo talked about the influence information technology would have on morals/ethics/culture. How Singapore was opening its society, but was aware that information would bring good and evil. The good has been hyped and received most attention, but we must be conscious of the evil that can also be caused. Some societies will be irrevocably changed so we must prepare. [Yeo did not mention any specific examples of what he thought "evil" was.] Gave an example of keeping one channel from the local cable broadcaster for very local programs, perhaps a channel where parents could select between various cameras showing the local playground, parking lot, surrounding open spaces, etc., so they'd be able to keep an eye on their children, check that things are safe. Information technology could also help strengthen local communities as well as bring great globalization. Using the technology within the school, church/temple, club and company to bring people closer, bonding them more strongly to each other and those community organizations. Thailand The panelist replaced the Thai communications minister. Far less developed than other countries represented. In rural Thailand introducing information technology means providing a telephone to every home, one that works 24 hours/day, 365 days/year. In the cities and developed regions (Bangkok/Phuket), people have a reliable telephone service and are beginning to demand networks to plug their computers into. Spoke of Buddhism and the basic human needs. Not possible to leave out the undesirable elements that new technology would bring, but work minimize the effects of the bad. Korea Korea Telecom to be privatized over the next 3 years. They have the basic network infrastructure and must now provide wireless and multimedia. Called Karoke the first true multimedia product - voice, video, text, interactivity. Noted that multimedia is different from many other markets in that products anything less than perfect will not be tolerated by consumers, e.g. a voice recognition system that only functioned with 90% success is not useful. Greater challenge to produce multimedia products. Asia generally lagged behind in the industrial revolution, the information revolution offers Asian countries a chance to jump on at the beginning. Korea has a strong potential role in the future sitting between Japan, China and Russia, geographical location and historical. US Mike Nelson. Message: 1. deregulation and liberalization 2. GII is Global (not G7-GII) 3. Steps to stimulate markets, stimulate growth of GII Follow the example of New Zealand. From one of the worst OECD rated countries for telecommunications (cost, available services, quality of service, etc.) to the best in 5 years. The result of liberalizing the market, allowing competition. Prices down 50% in 5 years. Sweden, UK, and parts of the US have all seen rapid growth after liberalization. Nelson's message for all nations was deregulate and open markets. The Brussels G7 meeting on GII was not just addressing the interests of the G7 nations [strong agreement from EU and Japanese panelists]. 11 key application areas proposed and these were global projects. Mentioned Carl Malamud's Internet World Fair as an example of how developed nations can help undeveloped get up to speed. World-wide communications alliances were also very important. GII will bring better jobs, better lives, richer cultural experience. Not homogeneous culture, but better access to all cultures of the world. EU Matthey. Information society is about communication, cooperation and integration. Communication technologies get customized, uses are often different from those first expected. There's a proliferation of satellite dishes in Brussels, not among the wealthier groups as marketers thought, but immigrant populations - 80% of dishes owned by immigrant pop. People from North Africa looking for programming that provides a link to their own culture. The reverse is true in North Africa, people using satellite to get French programming. Cooperation - G7 GII projects are about cooperation. Real, tangible projects which will gain more value as more countries join. Integration. East European countries are poised to join the EU, but there are gaps in levels of development and culture. Info Society will help bridge the gaps. Government must be involved, providing common rules at an international level, fair rules for competition and intellectual property. Public authorities are necessary to ensure universal access. Japan Yamaguchi, MPT. Talked about possible market size, the various studies underway, committees formed, etc. Government working on guidelines to be implemented by business. GII is not for G7 alone, Kyoto ITU conference attended by ministerial representatives of 50 countries and the Kyoto ITU declaration was adopted by the G7. Access for all must be guaranteed. Regional and global level cooperation must be strengthened. Need to respect and protect cultural and linguistic diversity, and security and intellectual property. General comments from the panel. Thailand. ITU's "Missing Link" document still applies to the world of communication, in fact the gap between haves and have-nots may be widening. So hopes to see assistance, knowledge and technology from developed countries. Nelson TWO crucial steps for Asian countries. 1. Bring competition to the telecommunications sector. Full competition will allow information infrastructure to develop, and develop quickly. 2. Content. Even if the information highway is built, it will not be used unless content is protected. Strengthening intellectual property law is vitally important. If creators are not protected, then local content creators will not emerge. A society with weak IP will always be second in line, waiting for the copy. India is a good example, strengthened IP laws have lead to amazing growth in software development sector. Yeo "How will my life be improved?" Happy now to relax reading one newspaper while drinking a cup of coffee, likes to play an occasional round of golf. With computers and information coming from everywhere, how will I have time for anything else? Some Malaysian and Singaporean schools have begun teaching the Japanese abacus again. Found that students with pocket calculators could not do simple maths, too easy with the calculator, never learnt the hard way. The human being can't be spoon-fed everything, and new technology may tend to do just that. We cannot become sluggish because of new technology. [He spoke like this for a while, they were the only comments from the panel to receive applause.] Nelson This technology will give more free time, jobs that now take hours can be completed in much less. Info Technology would give us our lives back. Noted the big decline in the US of traditional social sports such as league bowling, people no longer have time. Lack of time is in part caused by the general competitiveness of the economic environment, and part the transition underway from paper to computer. Once the transition stage is passed, more time will be available. EU Benefits will be great: in avoiding disputes, saving life, improving life. Japan We will be given more options by the new media, and the options will be much less passive than today's. Yeo Gore's information Highway was deeply appreciated in Singapore, but we must try to temper our basic enthusiasm and prepare also for new problems. Korea There is discussion in Korea about how the country can benefit from this. Railroads in Korea were built by colonial powers, good railroads, but they were designed to meet the colonial power's needs [to carry grain and ores to ports], not the needs of the Korean people. If Korea fully connects to the GII, will the more powerful outside forces of US, EU and Japan culture decide what form the information infrastructure takes, rather than building it to fit the needs of Korean culture. EU Key to culture is a well educated people. Asian countries have centuries of history and culture, education is an answer, isolation will not do. Non of us want Hollywood or Hollywood icons (he said Micky, Goofy and Donald Duck) moving in on our cultural heritage. Nelson Reduce the barriers of entry for those wanting to produce content and new local content providers will come. Hollywood's success is based on two high cost factors, creation and distribution. New technologies lower creation costs (example of Bulgarian folk music CD's at the top of the US music charts - CD produced for a few tens of thousands of dollars) and distribution in the future on digital networks will be cheap/accessible. People around the world still prefer local content when it is available, new technologies will make it available. Hollywood will also gain from information technology, but believes others will gain more. EU One of the most important features of Information Society is interactivity, said it was a shame that there is no interaction here between the panel and audience [at the beginning of the session the Chairman said there would be no Q&A.] The chairman followed this remark by asking the panel if they had any comments on interactivity [haha]. End.
Current thread:
- International Forum on Multimedia - brief/rough notes (from an IPer) Dave Farber (May 31)