Interesting People mailing list archives
VIDEO DIALTONE AND THE NATIONAL INFORMATION INFRASTRUCTURE
From: David Farber <farber () central cis upenn edu>
Date: Thu, 9 Dec 1993 14:06:33 -0500
VIDEO DIALTONE AND THE NATIONAL INFORMATION INFRASTRUCTURE Anyone who follows the debate on the development of the National Information Infrastructure is likely to hear the phrase "Video Dialtone." And those who are primarily concerned about broadening access to the Net are likely to just dismiss this as just more movies for couch potatoes. As currently written, the Video Dialtone rules set up by the FCC don't do much for ensuring open access to the Net. If fact, they have lots of flaws. But with some changes, a strong set of video dialtone rules could help expand access to the Net and promote a true diversity of information sources. BACKGROUND ON THE VIDEO DIALTONE RULES FCC's video dialtone regulations were originally created as a way to allow local telephone companies to deliver video programming to their customers. Local phone companies are still prevented from owning the video programs, but under these rules they get to take one step into the cable television market. The purpose of the regulations was two-fold: provide some competition for cable companies to force the price down, and encourage the telephone companies to invest more in modernizing their infrastructure. Sadly, the regulations are quite vague. They contain no technology or system architecture specifications. Under the rules a video dialtone system could be built just like today's cable systems -- lots of downstream channels with essentially no upstream capacity. Or, the system could be made up of a series of video information servers, onto which any video programmer can place programs. Or, some other architecture could be chosen. The only requirement on the telephone company operating a video distribution platform is to make this distribution capacity available according to the following terms. VDT service is divided into two categories: -Tier I: Basic distribution facilities which independent video programmers (VIPs) rent from the telco under a non-discriminatory tariff. Since no technology is specified, this tier can be implemented as just series of channels in a cable-like system, or as a series of menu choices in a server-based system. -Tier II: Enhanced service which the telco is allowed to own an operate, embellished will all the fancy navigational aides and development tools that the telco wants to make available. Under the regulations, telcos can own Tier II content up to 5% of the total system capacity. Note that the Markey infrastructure bill recently proposed (HR 3636), would increase the amount of programming that the telephone company can own to 25%. VIDEO DIALTONE AND ACCESS TO THE NET A key purpose of the video dialtone rules is to create incentives for local telephone companies to modernize and increase the capacity of their local networks to be able to carry bandwidth-hungry video signals. To creators of the rules also hoped that this high capacity enhancement to the telephone networks would offer high speed interactive/bi-directional capacity. There are at least three two big questions whose answers will determine whether video dialtone has any meaning beyond just a bunch of movies. 1. Will the telephone companies build enough upstream capacity into their video dialtone systems to make net access possible? 2. Will third-party inform providers, including IP providers, be able to hook into the video dialtone platform? 3. Will all of the standards for interconnection, signaling, control, etc., be open enough to enable third party programmers and providers to construct flexible and useful systems? To some, video dialtone (VDT) may seem like a backwards way to bring net access to more people. But remember, VDT is something that lots of telephone companies WANT to do. They want to do it because they think they can make money selling videos and other stuff over this platform. Also, because of its inclusion in the Markey bill, VDT may assumed increased importance. So, if we can structure the rules for offering this kind of service properly, it could serve as a critical gateway to lots of other nets and information services. This note is an early attempt to explore the usefulness of video dialtone as a model for promoting net access. Comments are appreciated. ...................................................................... Daniel J. Weitzner, Senior Staff Counsel <djw () eff org> Electronic Frontier Foundation 202-347-5400 (v) 1001 G St, NW Suite 950 East 202-393-5509 (f) Washington, DC 20001 *** Join EFF!!! Send mail to membership () eff org for information ***
Current thread:
- VIDEO DIALTONE AND THE NATIONAL INFORMATION INFRASTRUCTURE David Farber (Dec 09)