Security Incidents mailing list archives
Re: ***SPAM*** Re: ***SPAM*** Re: Massive SPAM Increase {-2.6} {-2.6}
From: "Dude VanWinkle" <dudevanwinkle () gmail com>
Date: Mon, 16 Oct 2006 21:59:12 -0400
On 10/14/06, Paul Schmehl <pauls () utdallas edu> wrote:
--On October 14, 2006 1:44:04 AM -0400 Valdis.Kletnieks () vt edu wrote:
> Tell you what. Explain what an *OUTBOUND* MX is, and I'll see what I > can do.
It appears that what you're missing is that this one "flaw" is not enough to get mail rejected by policyd-weight.
I dont intend to speak from another, but I think what Valdis is trying to point out is that whether or not the lack of an "outbound MX record" is detrimental to email delivery is not important. Rather, the fact a rule was included that shows a deep misunderstanding of SMTP and how it relates to DNS. This can only negatively affect the false positive/negative ratio, and might be an indication that other more serious flaws may be present in their implementation. -JP<I dont presume to presume> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ This List Sponsored by: Black HatAttend the Black Hat Briefings & Training USA, July 29-August 3 in Las Vegas. World renowned security experts reveal tomorrow's threats today. Free of vendor pitches, the Briefings are designed to be pragmatic regardless of your security environment. Featuring 36 hands-on training courses and 10 conference tracks, networking opportunities with over 2,500 delegates from 40+ nations.
http://www.blackhat.com ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Current thread:
- Re: Massive SPAM Increase {-2.6} {-2.6}, (continued)
- Re: Massive SPAM Increase {-2.6} {-2.6} Paul Schmehl (Oct 09)
- Re: Massive SPAM Increase {-2.6} {-2.6} Graeme Fowler (Oct 09)
- Re: Re: Massive SPAM Increase {-2.6} {-2.6} Luke Burton (Oct 09)
- Re: Massive SPAM Increase Tillmann Werner (Oct 10)
- Re: Massive SPAM Increase {-2.6} {-2.6} Valdis . Kletnieks (Oct 16)
- Re: ***SPAM*** Re: Massive SPAM Increase {-2.6} {-2.6} Paul Schmehl (Oct 16)
- Re: ***SPAM*** Re: Massive SPAM Increase {-2.6} {-2.6} Valdis . Kletnieks (Oct 16)
- Re: ***SPAM*** Re: ***SPAM*** Re: Massive SPAM Increase {-2.6} {-2.6} Paul Schmehl (Oct 16)
- Re: Massive SPAM Increase gabriel rosenkoetter (Oct 16)
- Re: Massive SPAM Increase Jamie Riden (Oct 17)
- Re: ***SPAM*** Re: ***SPAM*** Re: Massive SPAM Increase {-2.6} {-2.6} Dude VanWinkle (Oct 17)
- Re: ***SPAM*** Re: Massive SPAM Increase {-2.6} {-2.6} benfell (Oct 16)
- Re: ***SPAM*** Re: Massive SPAM Increase {-2.6} {-2.6} Paul Schmehl (Oct 16)
- Re: ***SPAM*** Re: Massive SPAM Increase {-2.6} {-2.6} gabriel rosenkoetter (Oct 17)
- Re: ***SPAM*** Re: Massive SPAM Increase {-2.6} {-2.6} Valdis . Kletnieks (Oct 16)
- Re: ***SPAM*** Re: Massive SPAM Increase {-2.6} {-2.6} Paul Schmehl (Oct 16)
- Re: ***SPAM*** Re: Massive SPAM Increase {-2.6} {-2.6} gabriel rosenkoetter (Oct 17)
- Re: ***SPAM*** Re: Massive SPAM Increase {-2.6} {-2.6} Valdis . Kletnieks (Oct 17)
- Re: ***SPAM*** Re: ***SPAM*** Re: Massive SPAM Increase {-2.6} {-2.6} Paul Schmehl (Oct 17)
- Re: ***SPAM*** Re: Massive SPAM Increase {-2.6} {-2.6} benfell (Oct 16)
- Re: ***SPAM*** Re: Massive SPAM Increase {-2.6} {-2.6} Dude VanWinkle (Oct 17)