Security Incidents mailing list archives
Re: Digital forensics of the physical memory
From: David Pick <d.m.pick () qmul ac uk>
Date: Mon, 20 Jun 2005 15:57:03 +0100
George and Ben,The original author does at one point use the term "image" to describe his evidence collection process. I think that use of this term was unfortunate because it invites comparison with classical approaches to evidence gathering and standards. It is not possible to "image" a reality that is constantly changing.Could you suggest a suitable term to use?A "smear," on the other hand, is a pejorative term which assumes that a changing reality cannot therefore be measured accurately.Perhaps you're correct about the use of the term "smear"...but how would you go about accurately measuring the changes that occur during the use of dd.exe?
I think "image" might be reasonably applied *if* the number of changes is sufficiently small. Think of an "image" taken by a camera with a focal-plane shutter... and the "image" generated by the sort of camera used to resolve "photo-finishes"... But we have to be clear that the "image" may not be taken at one instant of time, or between twqo machine bus-cycles. -- David Pick
Current thread:
- Digital forensics of the physical memory Mariusz Burdach (Jun 15)
- Re: Digital forensics of the physical memory Ben Hawkes (Jun 17)
- Re: Digital forensics of the physical memory Mariusz Burdach (Jun 17)
- Re: Digital forensics of the physical memory Harlan Carvey (Jun 17)
- RE: Digital forensics of the physical memory George M. Garner Jr. (Jun 18)
- RE: Digital forensics of the physical memory Harlan Carvey (Jun 20)
- Re: Digital forensics of the physical memory David Pick (Jun 20)
- Moderator's note: Re: Digital forensics of the physical memory Daniel Hanson (Jun 20)
- part deux, was -> RE: Digital forensics of the physical memory Harlan Carvey (Jun 20)
- Re: part deux, was -> RE: Digital forensics of the physical memory Ben Hawkes (Jun 20)
- Re: Digital forensics of the physical memory Ben Hawkes (Jun 17)