Security Incidents mailing list archives
Re: Strange SMTP sessions with 'helo=<large negative number>' syntax
From: mis () seiden com
Date: Thu, 29 Dec 2005 09:10:15 -0800
yeah, ipv4 addresses are 32 bit values, but i'm pretty sure the form in the helo string isn't just an integer, signed or unsigned, it's a fully qualified domain name. i should have also said: when i looked at it when this started they appeared to be random values, and choosing random helo strings is a common spammer trick from day 1. unfortunately, legit senders using actual correct fqdns in helo strings (rather than something like "localhost") is by no means universal, as you discover when the complaints start rolling in when you try to enforce this using, say postfix's check_helo_access. as another side note, the SPFv1 spec appears to allow checking of the spf record corresponding to the helo string, if it's a fqdn. (yet another oracle for spamming ips is the number of different helo strings used by a single IP address over a brief period of time, though it also detects natted outgoing mail gateways, rarely). On Thu, Dec 29, 2005 at 08:10:14AM -0500, Mike Davis wrote:
hehe, didnt even notice max untill i hit reply... the this be a screwy way to get some poor implementation of gethostbyname() (windows?) to interpret as an ip address? i vaguely recall an ie flaw a few years back doing something similar to disguise urls.. but i think they were removing dots like this: http://19216818/pornsite.html dont remember -phar On Thu, 2005-12-29 at 00:33 -0800, mis () seiden com wrote:this has been going on for weeks. i believe they're all open proxies or spambots. (some of us use this as an oracle for open proxies.) On Wed, Dec 28, 2005 at 04:39:14PM -0500, max wrote:Hello all, I find this inmy logs throughout the day today: Dec 28 16:35:52 finn postfix/smtpd[13320]: NOQUEUE: reject: RCPT from pcp0012209034pcs.blairblvd.tn.nash.comcast.net[69.245.57.210]: 501 <-1217882552>: Helo command rejected: Invalid name; from=<shuu () grandlakeindexing com> to=<dylanfans-unsubscribe () dylanirvana com> proto=SMTP helo=<-1217882552> Notice that helo section is a negative number (which is why my postfix rejects the message) There are about 5 messages a minute at its peak, and this has been going on most of the day today (EST time zone) Some of the connecting IP's are listed in various black lists, such as OPM. Has anyone noticed this as well? Is this a virus or just some new spam tool? Some more rejected messages below: Dec 28 16:37:50 finn postfix/smtpd[34627]: NOQUEUE: reject: RCPT from cpe-66-75-65-130.socal.res.rr.com[66.75.65.130]: 501 <-1218008120>: Helo command rejected: Invalid name; from=<Laudat () gma-consulting-fr com> to=<dylanfans-unsubscribe () dylanirvana com> proto=SMTP helo=<-1218008120> Dec 28 16:37:54 finn postfix/smtpd[13320]: NOQUEUE: reject: RCPT from unknown[219.130.49.89]: 554 Service unavailable; Client host [219.130.49.89] blocked using opm.blitzed.org; Open proxy - see http://opm.blitzed.org/219.130.49.89; from=<burkel () greenacresmortgage com> to=<max () neuropunks org> proto=SMTP helo=<-1209697480> Dec 28 16:38:10 finn postfix/smtpd[34627]: NOQUEUE: reject: RCPT from 194-144-9-218.du.xdsl.is[194.144.9.218]: 501 <-1209697480>: Helo command rejected: Invalid name; from=<brenno () grandslamtennistours com> to=<max () neuropunks org> proto=SMTP helo=<-1209697480> Thanks, Max
Current thread:
- Strange SMTP sessions with 'helo=<large negative number>' syntax max (Dec 28)
- Re: Strange SMTP sessions with 'helo=<large negative number>' syntax mis (Dec 29)
- Re: Strange SMTP sessions with 'helo=<large negative number>' syntax Mike Davis (Dec 29)
- Re: Strange SMTP sessions with 'helo=<large negative number>' syntax mis (Dec 29)
- Re: Strange SMTP sessions with 'helo=<large negative number>' syntax Paolo Scarabelli (Dec 30)
- Re: Strange SMTP sessions with 'helo=<large negative number>' syntax Mike Davis (Dec 29)
- Re: Strange SMTP sessions with 'helo=<large negative number>' syntax Michel Arboi (Dec 29)
- RE: Strange SMTP sessions with 'helo=<large negative number>' syntax David Gillett (Dec 30)
- Re: Strange SMTP sessions with 'helo=<large negative number>' syntax mis (Dec 29)