Security Incidents mailing list archives
RE: Port 3889 Traffic
From: "Dennis Schut" <Dennis.Schut () infratects nl>
Date: Tue, 11 May 2004 09:25:27 +0200
This is what I know about the ITV protocol. It's not much, but something is better then nothing. ITV is used by some applications that are using interactive TV, so let's say that you have an application that you can control via a touch screen, as far as I know these kinds of applications makes use of the ITV protocol. Some funky webcams are also using the ITV protocol. Best Regards, Dennis Schut Technical Consultant Infratects BV -----Original Message----- From: Francisco J. Pecorella R. [mailto:francisco.pecorella () cantv net] Sent: Monday, May 10, 2004 18:02 To: incidents () securityfocus com Subject: Re: Port 3889 Traffic I am not really sure what application by default uses port 3889. At http://www.iana.org/assignments/port-numbers itv-control 3899/tcp ITV Port itv-control 3899/udp ITV Port I recomend that you use fport at X.X.X.X. This software permit to know what application is opening a specific port. -- Best Regards ----- Original Message ----- From: <Josh.Berry () compucom com> To: <incidents () securityfocus com> Sent: Monday, May 10, 2004 11:30 AM Subject: RE: Port 3889 Traffic
Terminal Services is port 3389, not really sure what port 3889 is used for. -----Original Message----- From: kang [mailto:kang () insecure ws] Sent: Monday, May 10, 2004 9:59 AM To: incidents () securityfocus com Subject: Re: Port 3889 Traffic Eric Ceradsky wrote:I've been seeing a lot of port 3889 traffic externally lately but haven't been able to dig up any known issues with that port.. Used to be one address and overnight tis quickly spawned to several. Brazil, US, UK, etc. Anyone have any ideas?that's Terminal Server, or Remote Desktop, on Windows. An utility to take a visual remote control of a computer.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
---
------------------------------------------------------------------------
----
------------------------------------------------------------------------ -- -
------------------------------------------------------------------------ -- --
------------------------------------------------------------------------ --- ------------------------------------------------------------------------ ---- Infratects B.V. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Current thread:
- Re: Port 3889 Traffic, (continued)
- Re: Port 3889 Traffic kang (May 10)
- RE: Port 3889 Traffic Samuel Petreski (May 10)
- Re: Port 3889 Traffic kang (May 10)
- Re: Port 3889 Traffic KUIJPERS Jimmy (May 10)
- RE: Port 3889 Traffic Samuel Petreski (May 10)
- RE: Port 3889 Traffic Josh.Berry (May 10)
- Re: Port 3889 Traffic Francisco J. Pecorella R. (May 10)
- RE: Port 3889 Traffic Rob Shein (May 10)
- Re: Port 3889 Traffic Francisco J. Pecorella R. (May 10)
- RE: Port 3889 Traffic Meidinger Chris (May 10)
- RE: Port 3889 Traffic sk3tch (May 10)
- Re: Port 3889 Traffic Eric Ceradsky (May 11)
- RE: Port 3889 Traffic Dennis Schut (May 11)
- RE: Port 3889 Traffic Steven Trewick (May 11)
- Re: Port 3889 Traffic kang (May 10)