Security Incidents mailing list archives

Re: California State Bill SB1386


From: Rodrigo Barbosa <rodrigob () tisbrasil com br>
Date: Tue, 25 Mar 2003 01:20:51 -0300

On Sun, Mar 23, 2003 at 08:57:47PM -0800, Steve Zenone wrote:
I appreciate the various replies that I've received. However,
the fundamental question of what defines encryption, so far as
SB1386 is concerned, is still unanswered. I've looked through

Well, like it or not, ROT13 IS encryption.
Weak ? True. Stupid ? Even more true. But encryption it is.

The problem with legislation about technical issues is that we
depend on "lists" (theses methods are ok, these are not etc), or
on fairly abstract concepts.

Based on what I've seen this far about encryption legislation,
you are in for a very big trouble. This issue will have to be
resolved in court.

[]s

-- 
 Rodrigo Barbosa                   - rodrigob at tisbrasil.com.br
 "Quis custodiet ipsos custodes?" 


----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Powerful Anti-Spam Management and More...
SurfControl E-mail Filter puts the brakes on spam,
viruses and malicious code. Safeguard your business
critical communications. Download a free 30-day trial:
http://www.surfcontrol.com/go/zsfihl1


Current thread: