Security Incidents mailing list archives
RE: PDL anti-spam blacklist
From: "Jonathan A. Zdziarski" <jonathan () networkdweebs com>
Date: Mon, 6 Jan 2003 15:20:03 -0500
I'm just jumping in on this topic, but my two cents: There are many lists that just have poor maintenance practices, period, and make it nearly impossible for even the little guy (let alone large corporations) to get off the list. Take relays.osirusoft.com. Their "retest" email box requires you send an email from your mail server to get a retest (within about a week). Well the problems with this is: 1. Their server rejects email from blackholed hosts so you can't get it retested period. 2. Even if you could, what if you are using some IP space from a previous customer who had a dialup pool and the whole pool is blocked? This list imparticular has remarks laced with anti-corporate remarks and any attempt to contact them will result in your email getting deleted (according to the blackhole list administrator) and can take up to a month (according to them) to get anywhere. IMHO any blackhole list needs to have fair and reasonable list management practices. I personally feel adding dialup pools are ridiculous in the first place, but that's a little off topic. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- This list is provided by the SecurityFocus ARIS analyzer service. For more information on this free incident handling, management and tracking system please see: http://aris.securityfocus.com
Current thread:
- PDL anti-spam blacklist John Paul (Jan 02)
- Re: PDL anti-spam blacklist Mark (Jan 02)
- Re: PDL anti-spam blacklist jlewis (Jan 02)
- RE: PDL anti-spam blacklist Brian Taylor (Jan 03)
- RE: PDL anti-spam blacklist James Friesen (Jan 06)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- RE: PDL anti-spam blacklist Christopher Wagner (Jan 02)
- RE: PDL anti-spam blacklist Brian Taylor (Jan 06)
- RE: PDL anti-spam blacklist Jonathan A. Zdziarski (Jan 07)