Security Incidents mailing list archives
RE: Decrease in 1433 Scans?
From: "Salisko, Rick" <SaliskoR () ottawapolice ca>
Date: Thu, 23 May 2002 13:26:04 -0400
Ditto, no decrease here, although no increase either.... Rick -----Original Message----- From: loon [mailto:loon () loadedpenguin com] Sent: May 23, 2002 1:00 PM To: Matt Barton Cc: incidents () securityfocus com Subject: Re: Decrease in 1433 Scans? I am still recieving hits, although we only get hit by a single host, around once every 1-1.5 hours, albeit multiple connections per hit. So, our answer here would have to be - steady. cheers, loon On Thu, 23 May 2002, Matt Barton wrote:
Hello Access attempts to port 1433 have been steady all this week, with tons of attempts every hour showing up in our firewall log; however, I have not had a single attempt since 5:43 AM EST (no EDT here in Indiana). The firewall is still logging and the integrity of my access-list appears to be fine. I doubt our uplink provider is doing this, as I can reach the firewall if I attempt to connect to port 1433 with nmap from a remote system. Anyone else seeing this?
---------------------------------------------------------------------------- This list is provided by the SecurityFocus ARIS analyzer service. For more information on this free incident handling, management and tracking system please see: http://aris.securityfocus.com ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- This list is provided by the SecurityFocus ARIS analyzer service. For more information on this free incident handling, management and tracking system please see: http://aris.securityfocus.com
Current thread:
- Decrease in 1433 Scans? Matt Barton (May 23)
- Re: Decrease in 1433 Scans? loon (May 23)
- Re: Decrease in 1433 Scans? MIS Department (May 23)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- RE: Decrease in 1433 Scans? Salisko, Rick (May 23)
- RE: Decrease in 1433 Scans? John Campbell (May 23)