Security Incidents mailing list archives

Re: Compromised - Port 1524


From: "switched" <switched () q-east net>
Date: Wed, 6 Mar 2002 16:19:52 -0600

Yes, the default install of Redhat 6.2 had the VERY VERY vulnerable version
of wu-ftpd installed along with the vulnerable version of BIND if I recall
correctly.  Redhat 6.2 installs with out patches, etc. won't last very long
on the internet :).

 Does anyone know if
Redhat 6.2 default install contained a vulnerable wu_ftpd?
Unfortunately the machine was rebuilt before I could check the
version of wu_ftpd. I went ahead and checked my exploits for it and
wonder if anyone here had any default wuftpd installs of redhat 6.2
hit? If anyone has responded to a similar machine, please let me
know!

Eric


----------------------------------------------------------------------------
This list is provided by the SecurityFocus ARIS analyzer service.
For more information on this free incident handling, management 
and tracking system please see: http://aris.securityfocus.com


Current thread: