Security Incidents mailing list archives
RE: Who's liable?
From: "Liam Burrow" <afmmd () ihug com au>
Date: Sun, 14 Oct 2001 11:09:37 +1000
In terms of liability there really are three primary people I suspect you are asking about: 1. The Person in the company who did it 2. The Network Administrator 3. You, the Manager of the Company I'll deal with each as we go: The first person, if they did it, is certainly liable. Though in order to convict them of an offence it must be proved beyond a reasonable doubt to a jury. Satisfy those things (beyond reasonable doubt, and convince a jury) then they are guilty. The second person is the network administrator. In terms of criminal liability there is none (there is no requirement for normal civilian people to be a vigilante). They haven't committed a crime, negligence is not a crime, and nor is ignorance. However, they are not good things under civil actions, which means that they could be held liable to the manager of the company that they work for, for not providing the services they were paid for due to negligence etc. (And considering if it were the USA the case occurred in it would more than likely be possible they'd have civil liability in respect of 'allowing' the criminal to do something wrong :-/). If a civil case is brought, then a judge (or jury if opted) would need to be convinced on the balance of probabilities - and that would depend mainly on their contract of employment (ie is it protect the network focused, or just make sure the network runs fine, or is it a full security role?). So Network admin, possible civil liability but no criminal liability. 3. As you can probably guess the manager will not have any criminal liability and probably won't even have any civil liability (except, possibly, in the ironic manner suggested above). Note, the manager and the network admin must not have known about what was going on, at least to the extent that they could not be considered accessories, by aiding and abetting. Liam afmmd () ihug com au -----Original Message----- From: Michael F. Bell [mailto:mike_b () rhinobyte com] Sent: Sunday, 14 October 2001 8:12 AM To: incidents () securityfocus org Subject: Who's liable? These are fictional scenarios that I am SURE that other people would like to discuss. Lets say you are a small realty agency, and you provide internet access to your employees and one of your employees hacks into the Whitehouse website from your internal network. You do not have any logging going on from your SOHO firewall and the FBI shows up at your door one day with a warrant to search your computers for evidence of hacking into the Whitehouse website. The FBI searches all 10 computers in your network and comes up without any hard evidence from these 10 machines linking them to the the hack into the Whitehouse website. Your company is not doing any firewall logging and you do not have any public servers that could have been hacked so someone could have remotely launched the attack? All that the FBI has is your publicly NAT'ed firewall address. Who is liable?? What can the FBI do at this point? The above scenario is all fictional from my standpoint. I could imagine that this is someones reality though... Lets change the victim from a Goverment agency to a private one. Lets say that EBAY got hacked and they launched the same sort of investigation with the same findings.. What can be done from a legal /financial standpoint if an attack is detected from your company network and there is no proof on exactly who did it? Can the victims take legal action against you, or is there some sort of protocol from a legal standpoint that hinders this?
Michael Bell mike_b () rhinobyte com
---------------------------------------------------------------------------- This list is provided by the SecurityFocus ARIS analyzer service. For more information on this free incident handling, management and tracking system please see: http://aris.securityfocus.com ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- This list is provided by the SecurityFocus ARIS analyzer service. For more information on this free incident handling, management and tracking system please see: http://aris.securityfocus.com
Current thread:
- Who's liable? Michael F. Bell (Oct 13)
- Re: Who's liable? hvdkooij (Oct 13)
- Re: Who's liable? macdaddy (Oct 14)
- RE: Who's liable? Dom Genzano (Oct 14)
- Re: Who's liable? Kelly Martin (Oct 14)
- Re: Who's liable? macdaddy (Oct 14)
- Re: Who's liable? hvdkooij (Oct 13)
- Re: Who's liable? Jay D. Dyson (Oct 13)
- Re: Who's liable? - fbi Alvin Oga (Oct 13)
- Re: Who's liable? Alvin Oga (Oct 13)
- RE: Who's liable? Chris Mason (Oct 13)
- RE: Who's liable? Liam Burrow (Oct 13)
- RE: Who's liable? Russell Berry (Oct 13)
- RE: Who's liable? Brian Taylor (Oct 14)
- Re: Who's liable? Frank (Oct 14)
- RE: Who's liable? Michael Conlen (Oct 14)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- RE: Who's liable? Rob Keown (Oct 13)
- Re: Who's liable? Kelly Martin (Oct 13)
- Re: Who's liable? Doug Foster (Oct 14)
- Re: Who's liable? Kelly Martin (Oct 14)
- RE: Who's liable? Shashi Dookhee (Oct 14)
- Re: Who's liable? HarryM (Oct 14)
- Re: Who's liable? Kelly Martin (Oct 13)