Security Incidents mailing list archives
Re: ICMP_TIME_EXCEEDED to network address?
From: "Ralf G. R. Bergs" <rabe () RWTH-Aachen DE>
Date: Thu, 25 Jan 2001 19:59:09 +0100
On Thu, 25 Jan 2001 08:45:17 -0500, Curt Freeland wrote:
The top two offenders we see are: 202.178.243.254, 61.132.74.1
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ ACK! Altho the rate is much smaller than the one you're seeing, I get about 1 packet PER HOUR on my class C network.
If you have packet traces, send them to intrusion () sans org and reference my report of January 11.
Will do. -- Sign the EU petition against SPAM: L I N U X .~. http://www.politik-digital.de/spam/ The Choice /V\ of a GNU /( )\ Generation ^^-^^
Current thread:
- ICMP_TIME_EXCEEDED to network address? Ralf G. R. Bergs (Jan 24)
- Re: ICMP_TIME_EXCEEDED to network address? Ulrich Eckhardt (Jan 24)
- Re: ICMP_TIME_EXCEEDED to network address? Ralf G. R. Bergs (Jan 24)
- Re: ICMP_TIME_EXCEEDED to network address? Juergen P. Meier (Jan 25)
- Re: ICMP_TIME_EXCEEDED to network address? Ralf G. R. Bergs (Jan 24)
- Re: ICMP_TIME_EXCEEDED to network address? E, M (Jan 24)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: ICMP_TIME_EXCEEDED to network address? Curt Freeland (Jan 25)
- Re: ICMP_TIME_EXCEEDED to network address? Ralf G. R. Bergs (Jan 25)
- Re: ICMP_TIME_EXCEEDED to network address? Bill Royds (Jan 25)
- Re: ICMP_TIME_EXCEEDED to network address? Ulrich Eckhardt (Jan 24)