Re: Odd response from Taiwanese ISP

[Philippe Bourcier <philippe () CYBERABUSE ORG>]

Re

At anti Anti-Hack (@CyberAbuse) we mailed them about:

dns.emtek.idv.tw (211.75.220.99) - running the Kiky's rootkit
203.75.43.172 (203.75.43.172) - same
http://www.documents.cyberabuse.org/?doc=12

210.61.37.51 - box now fixed, which was running Stacheldraht
http://www.documents.cyberabuse.org/?doc=4


We never had any reply from them, but they fixed the box the first time we
mailed.
We will see what they do about the Kiky's (mailed Sunday)

Philippe Bourcier
-------------------------------------
www.documents.cyberabuse.org


> Greetings All,
>              A little off topic but I can't think of anywhere else to
> post this.
>
> Below is the response I got to a report sent to abuse () hinet net.  The
> report described a extentive scan of our address space for machines
> running LPD (tcp port 515) and included accurate times and log records.
>
> I really don't know what to make of this.  It looks to me as if Hinet
> does not have an AUP and that they will only act on complaints that the
> police will prosecute on.
>
> Does anyone else have any iformation on what is going on here?
>
> Cheers, Russell,
>
>
> --- Begin Forwarded Message ---
> Date: Mon, 20 Nov 2000 14:44:20 +0800
> From: XXXXXqXHXXXXXXXXXqXXXAXXXX <spam () ms1 hinet net>
> Subject: Reply from HiNet
> Sender: XXXXXqXHXXXXXXXXXqXXXAXXXX <spam () ms1 hinet net>
> To: Security () auckland ac nz
>
> Reply-To: XXXXXqXHXXXXXXXXXqXXXAXXXX <spam () ms1 hinet net>
> Message-ID: <200011201001.SAA25508 () ms63 hinet net>
>
>
>
> Dear Sir/Madam ,
> If you would like to report about the cracker leeter. Please send it to
criminal
> investigation department then they will submit it with it with formal
documentation.
> Please send mail to cybercop () cib gov tw
> Sorry for the inconveniences.
>
> Yours faithfully
>
> CHT-D
> Customer Care Center
>
> [ my original report deleted ]
>
> --- End Forwarded Message ---