Security Incidents mailing list archives
Re: FW: PPark (was: Win 95 Question)
From: ifightspam () BIGFOOT COM (Aussie)
Date: Wed, 1 Mar 2000 21:12:38 +1100
Date sent: Mon, 28 Feb 2000 11:54:42 -0700 From: Brett Glass <brett () LARIAT ORG> Subject: Re: FW: PPark (was: Win 95 Question)
Turns out that it's so. There's a new, "unpacked" variant, and the current McAfee patterns don't catch it! This is probably why we are seeing a resurgence.
I received a copy from one of my clients last night...one that was also sent to the other 100 or so people in her address book.....my Norton sigs from 24 Feb picked it up, but hers from 7 Feb didn't. Seems like everyone should be doing an update ASAP. An alert has been sent to those poeple who received the virus from her and at least 2 have been infected and subsequently disinfected. David Mudford
Current thread:
- Re: FW: PPark (was: Win 95 Question) Robert Graham (Feb 29)
- Re: PPark (was: Win 95 Question) Russell Fulton (Feb 29)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: FW: PPark (was: Win 95 Question) Aussie (Mar 01)
- Re: FW: PPark (was: Win 95 Question) Russell Fulton (Mar 02)