Security Incidents mailing list archives
Re: R: Re: Korea (was RE: ?)
From: thomas () 88 NET (thomas lakofski)
Date: Wed, 2 Feb 2000 00:23:22 +0000
On Mon, 31 Jan 2000, Jordan Ritter wrote:
On Sun, 30 Jan 2000, Raistlin wrote: # > You have no right to 'investigate', if by that you mean using # > any unauthorized access to a machine that is not legally yours to # > administrate. # # If a machine offers a service I have all rights to use it. This is the # basical rule of networking. I'm sure the CEO who dials up to the internet on his Windows 98 box, sharing his entire harddrive (including his quarterly and annual financial reports), ignorant of the possible transgressions, would disagree. Is it his fault? Yes. Does that make it okay? No.
Sure. I'll leave my apartment door open in new york city, and put a sign in the window indicating this fact. Yes, it's still illegal to take my stuff. Will the police or insurance company sympathise? I doubt it. ...... who's watching your watchmen? EF D8 33 68 B3 E3 E9 D2 C1 3E 51 22 8A AA 7B 98
Current thread:
- Re: R: Re: Korea (was RE: ?) Jordan Ritter (Jan 31)
- Re: R: Re: Korea (was RE: ?) thomas lakofski (Feb 01)
- Re: R: Re: Korea (was RE: ?) Jordan Ritter (Feb 02)
- why 1548? T.Esting (Feb 02)
- Re: R: Re: Korea (was RE: ?) thomas lakofski (Feb 01)