Honeypots mailing list archives
RE: statistics
From: "Golomb, Gary" <GGolomb () enterasys com>
Date: Mon, 25 Aug 2003 11:01:23 -0400
"Deterring" attackers from your network is a loss of value? What's good for the security researcher is not necessarily good for the organization that needs to worry about policy compliance. The "value" of a honeynet is relative to the environment it's in and the people administrating it. The use of "detection" technologies as a deterrent might be the only value those systems have in many organizations. -gary
Original Message: From: Michael Anuzis [mailto:michael_anuzis () hotmail com] Reducing honeypots/honeynets to a mere deterrant loses a lot of their value. Any business that's taken the time to set up a honeynet properly
probably
doesn't want to make its hand public. Michael Anuzis, CCNA Network Security Consultant Mobile: 248.376.7030 CTO, Advanced DataTactics, Inc. CTO, Advanced InfoTactics, Inc.From: Joshua Krage <jkrage () guisarme net> To: honeypots () securityfocus com Subject: Re: statistics Date: Fri, 22 Aug 2003 17:46:39 -0400 On Fri, Aug 22, 2003 at 02:45:43PM +0100, Luis Miguel Silva wrote:What would be the point to use honeypot technologies if
organisations
told everybody they use it? :o) :) How about as a deterrent? If that seems valid, them I have a couple /16s of honeypots. You'll
just
have to guess where they are. ;)_________________________________________________________________ Get MSN 8 and enjoy automatic e-mail virus protection. http://join.msn.com/?page=features/virus
Current thread:
- statistics Motayyam79 (Aug 22)
- RE: statistics Luis Miguel Silva (Aug 22)
- Re: statistics Joshua Krage (Aug 22)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: statistics Michael Anuzis (Aug 24)
- RE: statistics Golomb, Gary (Aug 25)
- RE: statistics Michael Anuzis (Aug 25)
- RE: statistics Luis Miguel Silva (Aug 22)