Honeypots mailing list archives

RE: IPv6


From: <mike () honeynet org>
Date: Wed, 18 Dec 2002 12:00:37 -0500 (EST)

Sure...

If the host they want to connect back to is on an ipv6 network.  They
would have to do ipv6 over ipv4 (sometimes :).

Mike



Other than hiding traffic once its been compromised, is there any other
reasons to use IP6?

Charles

-----Original Message-----
From: Colin Stubbs [mailto:cjstubbs () optushome com au]
Sent: Wednesday, December 18, 2002 7:46 AM
To: honeypots () securityfocus com
Subject: Re: IPv6

I'm not sure how wide spread this is, since I'm not regularly working
with compromised machines. But I was under the impression this was
almost old hat now, as it's a fairly logical method of avoiding
IDS/firewalls/etc.

More importantly, I saw this used to hide remote access on a compromised
Debian 2.2 box I cleaned up early March 2002, it was part of a rootkit,
though I no longer have any info on, or files from that particular
machine.

Colin Stubbs

On Wed, 2002-12-18 at 12:34, Lance Spitzner wrote:
Recently one of the Honeynet Project's Solaris Honeynets was
compromised.
What made this attack unique was after breaking into the system, the
attackers enabled IPv6 tunneling on the system, with communications
being
forwarded to another country.  The attack and communications were
captured
using Snort, however the data could not be decoded due to the IPv6
tunneling.  Also, once tunneled, this could potentialy disable/bypass
the
capabilities of some IDS systems.

Marty is addressing this issue and has added IPv6 decode support to
Snort.  Its not part of Snort current (2.0) yet, its still in the
process of testing.  If you would like to test this new capability,
you can find it online at

    http://www.snort.org/~roesch/

Marty's looking for feedback.  As IPv6 usage spreads, especially in
Asia, you will want to be prepared for it.  Keep in mind, even in
IPv4 environments (as was our Solaris Honeynet) attackers can
encode their data in IPv6 and then tunnel it through IPv4.  We will
most likely being seeing more of this type of behavior.

Just a friendly heads-up :)

--
Lance Spitzner
http://www.tracking-hackers.com






--------------------------------------------------------


The information contained in this message is intended only for the
recipient, and may be a confidential attorney-client communication or
may otherwise be privileged and confidential and protected from
disclosure. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient,
or an employee or agent responsible for delivering this message to the
intended recipient, please be aware that any dissemination or copying of
this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this
communication in error, please immediately notify us by replying to the
message and deleting it from your computer.

Thank you,

Standard & Poor's

--------------------------------------------------------






Current thread: