funsec mailing list archives
Re: More reasons not to trust electronic voting ...
From: Jeffrey Walton <noloader () gmail com>
Date: Tue, 6 Nov 2012 13:07:46 -0500
On Tue, Nov 6, 2012 at 6:44 AM, Rich Kulawiec <rsk () gsp org> wrote:
We don't need more reasons. All such systems not only cannot be trusted, they *must not* be trusted. Schneier did the clinching analysis eight years ago: Stealing an Election https://www.schneier.com/crypto-gram-0404.html#4 and the only things that have changed in the interim are (a) the attacker budget has dramatically increased and (b) the cost of the required technology has decreased.
I believe lobbyists have made more political contributions. The contributions will likely trump all technical arguments, including Moore's Law. Jeff _______________________________________________ Fun and Misc security discussion for OT posts. https://linuxbox.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/funsec Note: funsec is a public and open mailing list.
Current thread:
- More reasons not to trust electronic voting ... Rob, grandpa of Ryan, Trevor, Devon & Hannah (Nov 05)
- Re: More reasons not to trust electronic voting ... Rich Kulawiec (Nov 06)
- Re: More reasons not to trust electronic voting ... Jeffrey Walton (Nov 06)
- Re: More reasons not to trust electronic voting ... Rich Kulawiec (Nov 06)