funsec mailing list archives

It's legal: cops seize cell phone, impersonate owner


From: Jeffrey Walton <noloader () gmail com>
Date: Tue, 31 Jul 2012 02:22:04 -0400

http://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2012/07/its-legal-cops-seize-cell-phone-impersonate-owner/

In November 2009, police officers in the state of Washington seized an
iPhone belonging to suspected drug dealer Daniel Lee. While the phone
was in police custody, a man named Shawn Hinton sent a text message to
the device, reading, "Hey whats up dogg can you call me i need to talk
to you." Suspecting that Hinton was looking to buy drugs from Lee,
Detective Kevin Sawyer replied to the message, posing as Lee. With a
series of text messages, he arranged to meet Hinton in the parking lot
of a local grocery store—where Hinton was arrested and charged with
attempted possession of heroin.

Hinton wasn't Sawyer's only target. According to a court decision
summing up the facts, "Sawyer spent about 5 or 10 minutes looking at
some of the text messages on the iPhone; he also looked to see who had
been calling. Many of the text messages that Lee's iPhone had received
and stored were from individuals who were seeking drugs from Lee."

So Sawyer texted one of the individuals on the list and asked him if
he "needed more." The individual, Jonathan Roden, replied, "Yeah, that
would be cool. I still gotta sum, but I could use some more. I prefer
to just get a ball, so I'm only payin' one eighty for it, instead of
two Ts for two hundred, that way." (The court helpfully explained that
a "ball" is "a drug weight equivalent to approximately 3.5 grams.")

But can cops legally do this with seized cell phones? When their cases
went to trial, Hinton and Roden both argued that Sawyer had violated
their privacy rights by intercepting, without a warrant, private
communications intended for Lee.

But in a pair of decisions, one of which was recently covered by
Forbes, a Washington state appeals court disagreed. If the decisions,
penned by Judge Joel Penoyar and supported by one of his colleagues,
are upheld on appeal, they could have far-reaching implications for
cell phone privacy.
...
_______________________________________________
Fun and Misc security discussion for OT posts.
https://linuxbox.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/funsec
Note: funsec is a public and open mailing list.

Current thread: