funsec mailing list archives
Re: APT definition
From: Paul Ferguson <fergdawgster () gmail com>
Date: Mon, 11 Apr 2011 17:26:23 -0700
On Mon, Apr 11, 2011 at 5:25 PM, security curmudgeon <jericho () attrition org> wrote:
: > As is "persistent".. sending a couple PDFs to employees over a one day : > period got the foot in the door of RSA. That is not "persistent" as far as : > anything I have seen or done. : : Yes, but it *is* persistent as we have seen these same targeted, : socially-engineered attacks for years now. Uh.. If that is grounds for using "persistent", can you please enlighten us as to any attack that is NOT persistent?
I told you I don't like the term anyways. :-) - ferg -- "Fergie", a.k.a. Paul Ferguson Engineering Architecture for the Internet fergdawgster(at)gmail.com ferg's tech blog: http://fergdawg.blogspot.com/ _______________________________________________ Fun and Misc security discussion for OT posts. https://linuxbox.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/funsec Note: funsec is a public and open mailing list.
Current thread:
- APT definition Rob, grandpa of Ryan, Trevor, Devon & Hannah (Apr 11)
- Re: APT definition Paul Ferguson (Apr 11)
- Re: APT definition security curmudgeon (Apr 11)
- Re: APT definition Paul Ferguson (Apr 11)
- Re: APT definition security curmudgeon (Apr 11)
- Re: APT definition Paul Ferguson (Apr 11)
- Re: APT definition Valdis . Kletnieks (Apr 11)
- Re: APT definition Valdis . Kletnieks (Apr 11)
- Re: APT definition Joel Esler (Apr 11)
- Re: APT definition RL Vaughn (Apr 11)
- Re: APT definition security curmudgeon (Apr 11)
- Re: APT definition rackow (Apr 11)
- Re: APT definition Rich Kulawiec (Apr 12)
- Re: APT definition Paul Ferguson (Apr 11)