Intel's new chip-based DRM may violate monopoly laws

["Rob, grandpa of Ryan, Trevor, Devon & Hannah" <rMslade () shaw ca>]

Intel claims it's not DRM

http://blogs.intel.com/technology/2011/01/intel_insider_-_what_is_it_no.php

(Right.  It's not TCM/TCP/TCPI/Palladium, either ...)

======================  (quote inserted randomly by Pegasus Mailer)
rslade () vcn bc ca     slade () victoria tc ca     rslade () computercrime org
        Microsoft is not the ANSWER.  Microsoft is the QUESTION,
                        and the ANSWER is NO!
victoria.tc.ca/techrev/rms.htm blog.isc2.org/isc2_blog/slade/index.html
http://blogs.securiteam.com/index.php/archives/author/p1/
http://www.infosecbc.org/links http://twitter.com/rslade
_______________________________________________
Fun and Misc security discussion for OT posts.
https://linuxbox.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/funsec
Note: funsec is a public and open mailing list.