Re: sci.crypt replacement?

["Paul M. Moriarty" <pmm () igtc com>]

Usenet?  How quaint.

On Sep 6, 2010, at 8:48 AM, Jeffrey Walton wrote:

> Hi All,
>
> What's the deal with searching for sci.crypt usenet group?
>
> I used a popular text based search engine to locate the group using
> the search "sci.crypt". The results were:
> * sci.crypt.random-numbers
> * sci.crypt.research
> * 4 more
>
> Upon expanding "4 more", the next result was:
> Science and Cryptography   science-and-cryptography () googlegroups com
> To be a suitable replacement for sci.crypt.
> 12 members
>
> The *last* result was the group sci.crypt.
>
> Why in the world would anyone want to use a 12-member "suitable
> replacement" named "Science and Cryptography" when a group with deep
> usenet tradition exists? Is this more SEO bullshit? Or just search
> provider bullshit?
>
> Jeff
> _______________________________________________
> Fun and Misc security discussion for OT posts.
> https://linuxbox.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/funsec
> Note: funsec is a public and open mailing list.

_______________________________________________
Fun and Misc security discussion for OT posts.
https://linuxbox.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/funsec
Note: funsec is a public and open mailing list.