funsec mailing list archives
Re: U.S. Military Wants to Exert Influence Over Private Cyber Infrastructure
From: Dave Paris <dparis () w3works com>
Date: Fri, 27 Aug 2010 02:26:23 +0000
On 8/27/2010 1:05 AM, Paul Ferguson wrote:
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Considering how the U.S. Military can't even protect it's own networks against well-known USB malware, I find this suggestion laughable.
[...] But not just *any* of their networks, a *classified* network. I think I'm more offended than in hysterics. A) they've proven they're not up to the job on their "critical assets" network - let alone their garden variety networks. B) uhmmm.. right. US Military having control over private networks. Pretty sure something in the Constitution says that's against the rules. That takes some titanium cajones. I'd like to see Herr Lynn's letter of resignation over this one. _______________________________________________ Fun and Misc security discussion for OT posts. https://linuxbox.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/funsec Note: funsec is a public and open mailing list.
Current thread:
- U.S. Military Wants to Exert Influence Over Private Cyber Infrastructure Paul Ferguson (Aug 26)
- Re: U.S. Military Wants to Exert Influence Over Private Cyber Infrastructure Dave Paris (Aug 26)
- Re: U.S. Military Wants to Exert Influence Over Private Cyber Infrastructure Marc (Aug 26)
- Re: U.S. Military Wants to Exert Influence Over Private Cyber Infrastructure Paul Ferguson (Aug 27)
- Re: U.S. Military Wants to Exert Influence Over Private Cyber Infrastructure Rich Kulawiec (Aug 27)
- Re: U.S. Military Wants to Exert Influence Over Private Cyber Infrastructure Marc (Aug 26)
- Re: U.S. Military Wants to Exert Influence Over Private Cyber Infrastructure Dave Paris (Aug 26)