funsec mailing list archives
Re: too big to succeed?
From: Robert Portvliet <robert.portvliet () gmail com>
Date: Fri, 8 Jan 2010 08:36:08 -0500
The US government doesn't do small & efficient. Large & wasteful enriches far more connected 'contributers'.. someone's going to make a pretty penny filling all those full body scanner orders... On Fri, Jan 8, 2010 at 6:17 AM, Gadi Evron <ge () linuxbox org> wrote:
A different look at Homeland Security, from Christopher Buckley: http://www.thedailybeast.com/blogs-and-stories/2010-01-07/too-big-to-succeed/ -- Gadi Evron, ge () linuxbox org. Blog: http://gevron.livejournal.com/ _______________________________________________ Fun and Misc security discussion for OT posts. https://linuxbox.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/funsec Note: funsec is a public and open mailing list.
_______________________________________________ Fun and Misc security discussion for OT posts. https://linuxbox.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/funsec Note: funsec is a public and open mailing list.
Current thread:
- too big to succeed? Gadi Evron (Jan 08)
- Re: too big to succeed? Dave Paris (Jan 08)
- Re: too big to succeed? Robert Portvliet (Jan 08)
- Re: too big to succeed? Discini, Sonny (Jan 08)
- Re: too big to succeed? Dave Paris (Jan 08)
- Message not available
- Re: too big to succeed? Benjamin Brown (Jan 09)
- Re: too big to succeed? Discini, Sonny (Jan 08)