funsec mailing list archives
Re: fog of cyberwar
From: Jason Lewis <jlewis () packetnexus com>
Date: Sun, 24 Jan 2010 10:46:18 -0500
Has anyone considered thatt they knew about the vuln and the govt asked them to not fix it until it was public? On Sat, Jan 23, 2010 at 7:18 PM, Gadi Evron <ge () linuxbox org> wrote:
On 1/23/10 11:54 PM, Rich Kulawiec wrote:If what they're doing was going to work, it would have worked by now.It has worked. Microsoft has made incredible efforts and their code is extremely professional. That does not mean the policy is right. Gadi. -- Gadi Evron, ge () linuxbox org. Blog: http://gevron.livejournal.com/ _______________________________________________ Fun and Misc security discussion for OT posts. https://linuxbox.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/funsec Note: funsec is a public and open mailing list.
_______________________________________________ Fun and Misc security discussion for OT posts. https://linuxbox.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/funsec Note: funsec is a public and open mailing list.
Current thread:
- Re: fog of cyberwar, (continued)
- Re: fog of cyberwar Gadi Evron (Jan 22)
- Re: fog of cyberwar Dan Kaminsky (Jan 22)
- Re: fog of cyberwar Gadi Evron (Jan 22)
- Re: fog of cyberwar Joel Helgeson (Jan 23)
- Re: fog of cyberwar Vaughn, Randal L. (Jan 22)
- Re: fog of cyberwar Rich Kulawiec (Jan 22)
- Re: fog of cyberwar Gadi Evron (Jan 22)
- Re: fog of cyberwar phester (Jan 23)
- Re: fog of cyberwar Rich Kulawiec (Jan 23)
- Re: fog of cyberwar Gadi Evron (Jan 23)
- Re: fog of cyberwar Jason Lewis (Jan 24)
- Re: fog of cyberwar Dan White (Jan 24)
- Re: fog of cyberwar phester (Jan 24)
- Re: fog of cyberwar steve pirk [egrep] (Jan 24)
- Re: fog of cyberwar Rich Kulawiec (Feb 01)
- Re: fog of cyberwar Valdis . Kletnieks (Jan 23)
- Re: fog of cyberwar Rich Kulawiec (Jan 24)