funsec mailing list archives
Re: predictions
From: Nick FitzGerald <nick () virus-l demon co uk>
Date: Sat, 16 Jan 2010 12:14:55 +1300
Dan Kaminsky to me:
To the extent that predicting "more of the same" is prescient, yes...Nobody is surprised by the attack. Everybody is surprised by there actually being consequences -- against a state interest, no less.
That's funny -- "everybody"... Oh,wait, I see -- you were making your post relevant to the list charter! Of course there were consequences and no-one worth knowing would be surprised by any of this. The only thing I find at all surprising is that anyone actually thinks this is particularly newsworthy -- such attacks by the Chinese are far from new and anyone worth knowing already knows how generally incompetent corporate and government institutions are at (proactive) IT security... Regards, Nick FitzGerald _______________________________________________ Fun and Misc security discussion for OT posts. https://linuxbox.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/funsec Note: funsec is a public and open mailing list.
Current thread:
- predictions Larry Seltzer (Jan 15)
- Re: predictions Nick FitzGerald (Jan 15)
- Re: predictions Larry Seltzer (Jan 15)
- Re: predictions David Harley (Jan 15)
- Re: predictions Martin Tomasek (Jan 15)
- Re: predictions Dan Kaminsky (Jan 15)
- Re: predictions Nick FitzGerald (Jan 15)
- Re: predictions Dan Kaminsky (Jan 15)
- Re: predictions Larry Seltzer (Jan 15)
- Re: predictions Dan Kaminsky (Jan 15)
- Re: predictions Nick FitzGerald (Jan 15)
- Re: predictions Paul Ferguson (Jan 15)
- China tangent Larry Seltzer (Jan 15)
- Re: China tangent chaim . rieger (Jan 15)
- Re: predictions Larry Seltzer (Jan 15)
- Re: predictions Dan Kaminsky (Jan 15)
- Re: predictions Nick FitzGerald (Jan 15)
- Re: predictions H. Kurth Bemis (Jan 19)