funsec mailing list archives

Re: ICANN Approves Non-Latin Domain Name Characters


From: Dan Kaminsky <dan () doxpara com>
Date: Sat, 31 Oct 2009 13:32:40 -0400

I wouldn't say there's much of a difference in social engineering  
opportunities -- what we have now with semantic collisions is pretty  
effective already.

Punycode support is only in the browsers, and only in certain  
conditions. Shmoo scared people good with their homograph attacks a  
few years back.

There are bugs in DNS decoders that hit from time to time, usually in  
record types, sometimes with DNS compression. Punycode is complex and  
will get buggy implementations.



On Oct 31, 2009, at 12:15 PM, "Larry Seltzer" <larry () larryseltzer com>  
wrote:

Just kidding about the "looking for quotes" line. I won't implicate
anyone here unless you tell me you want to be quoted, and then I'll  
just
garble the quote to humiliate you.

Really, I'll treat this thread as an educational experience, make up  
my
own mind and talk about that. So far my guess is that, based on pretty
much all prior experience on the Internet, there have to be  
exploitable
software bugs and social engineering opportunities in this, probably
significant ones. How much support is there right now in available
software for punycode?

Here's a stupid question: Is it possible that there are buffer  
overflows
out there just from all the extra bytes in domain names?

Larry Seltzer
Contributing Editor, PC Magazine
larry_seltzer () ziffdavis com
http://blogs.pcmag.com/securitywatch/


-----Original Message-----
From: funsec-bounces () linuxbox org [mailto:funsec-bounces () linuxbox org]
On Behalf Of Larry Seltzer
Sent: Saturday, October 31, 2009 9:40 AM
To: funsec () linuxbox org
Subject: Re: [funsec] ICANN Approves Non-Latin Domain Name Characters

Oh I know all this, just looking for quotes.

Larry Seltzer
Contributing Editor, PC Magazine
larry_seltzer () ziffdavis com
http://blogs.pcmag.com/securitywatch/


-----Original Message-----
From: Paul Ferguson [mailto:fergdawgster () gmail com]
Sent: Saturday, October 31, 2009 9:35 AM
To: Larry Seltzer
Cc: funsec () linuxbox org
Subject: Re: [funsec] ICANN Approves Non-Latin Domain Name Characters

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On Sat, Oct 31, 2009 at 6:14 AM, Larry Seltzer  
<larry () larryseltzer com>
wrote:


http://www.pcmag.com/article2/0,2817,2355068,00.asp?kc=PCRSS05079TX1K000
0
992



So have the security implications of these new domain names really
been
thought through?


No.

If nothing else, expanding the TLD space expands the abuse footprint.

Further, expanding the TLD footprint in areas which are not clearly
'recognizable' by some applications, etc., will certainly have a
tendency
to be targets for abuse by criminals.

Of course, this may sound obvious -- and it is.

But expanding the TLD space into the IDN direction is not all sunshine
and
rainbows -- it also opens up a whole new gateway for enormous abuse  
and
exploitation.

It should be obvious to anyone with a clue. :-)

- - ferg

p.s. I'm in Taipei at the moment, which should underscore the issues
that I
am talking about, et al.

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: PGP Desktop 9.5.3 (Build 5003)

wj8DBQFK7Dzhq1pz9mNUZTMRAgxlAJ9FzZzBmRmoPfN4EHhSRo2g19/WvQCgzCJO
5V6IySqInkTmQlkoxSqb1tk=
=COHl
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


-- 
"Fergie", a.k.a. Paul Ferguson
Engineering Architecture for the Internet
fergdawgster(at)gmail.com
ferg's tech blog: http://fergdawg.blogspot.com/

_______________________________________________
Fun and Misc security discussion for OT posts.
https://linuxbox.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/funsec
Note: funsec is a public and open mailing list.

_______________________________________________
Fun and Misc security discussion for OT posts.
https://linuxbox.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/funsec
Note: funsec is a public and open mailing list.
_______________________________________________
Fun and Misc security discussion for OT posts.
https://linuxbox.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/funsec
Note: funsec is a public and open mailing list.


Current thread: