Re: No AV? Shock, horror!

[Nick FitzGerald <nick () virus-l demon co uk>]

Dan Kaminsky wrote:

> Non-rhetorical question:
>
> Is there a source of data showing 10,000 machines with AV are less
> likely to be infected than 10,000 machines without?

To the best of my knowledge there are no epidemiological studies of AV 
s/w such as could tell us the answer to this question, or the related 
one "in the field, which of products X, Y or Z actually affords the 
best protection".



Regards,

Nick FitzGerald


_______________________________________________
Fun and Misc security discussion for OT posts.
https://linuxbox.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/funsec
Note: funsec is a public and open mailing list.