funsec mailing list archives

Re: press trickery of the worst kind


From: "Tomas L. Byrnes" <tomb () byrneit net>
Date: Wed, 15 Jul 2009 08:45:24 -0700

It was, perhaps, a bit hyperbolic. I've run into a few decent ones as
well, but I've found that the overwhelming majority of journalists,
especially those from old media or the blogosphere, are activists with
an agenda, who will twist whatever is said to suit their viewpoint; or
out and out hacks with no understanding of technology who are just
looking for sensationalist pieces to sell ad space.

Unfortunately, I've been burned, and I've seen others I respect and care
about (including my father) badly burned.

If you can find a journalist who isn't a shill for an ideology or a
platform, who is actually willing to take the time to do their research,
then they are a diamond in the rough.

I've found that all the ones I've talked to who write for the IEEE pubs
fit that description.




-----Original Message-----
From: Dan Kaminsky [mailto:dan () doxpara com]
Sent: Wednesday, July 15, 2009 12:32 AM
To: Tomas L. Byrnes
Cc: Gadi Evron; funsec
Subject: Re: [funsec] press trickery of the worst kind

This is a bit of an overreaction. Anyone on this list gets an inquiry
from someone they're wondering about, ping me privately. There's some
good eggs out there.



On Jul 15, 2009, at 2:30 PM, "Tomas L. Byrnes" <tomb () byrneit net>
wrote:

I only speak to writers for IEEE technical publications, at peer
conferences, write my own pieces, or do first-person, live
interviews on
TV for this reason.

"Clear writers assume, with a pessimism born of experience, that
whatever
isn't plainly stated the reader will invariably misconstrue." - John
R.
Trimble

I guess a modern paraphrase would be:

"Clear speakers assume, with a pessimism born of experience, that
whatever
Can be twisted and misconstrued will invariably be so."

Journalist:(n) One without the literary talent or credibility to
write
their own prose or be believed on their own, but the ability to twist
others' beyond comprehension to suit their purposes.




-----Original Message-----
From: funsec-bounces () linuxbox org [mailto:funsec-
bounces () linuxbox org]
On Behalf Of Gadi Evron
Sent: Tuesday, July 14, 2009 10:42 PM
To: funsec
Subject: Re: [funsec] press trickery of the worst kind

Update:
Mr. Harris sent me an email stating he sent in a correction
recommendation. Let's see what happens with it.



Gadi Evron wrote:
I spoke yesterday with one David Harris--I shouldn't have. He is a
reporter for a Chinese publication and was writing a story on
"cyber
war" in the middle east. He was referenced by a friend so I was
happy
to
help him.

I mentioned how whenever there are political and ethnic
tensions--anywhere, cyber after-math follows. This often consists
of
silliness such as kids attacking with defacement and DDoS attacks.
I
also mentioned "warfare" is buzzword, hyped, over-kill which
shouldn't
be used lightly.

At no point did I speak of Israel as a state. I told the reporter
that
I
don't work for the Israeli government these days and that I can't
comment anyway as I know nothing about what Israel does or doesn't
do.

Here is what he wrote:

   "Gadi Evron, a private consultant formerly responsible for
security in
Israeli government's non-military computer system, does not deny
that
his country has a large-scale activity using the Internet to
disrupt
enemy activities. He just tends to err when it comes to talk of the
more
grandiose plots. "

Even if I forgive him for calling me a consultant...
I called the guy, and he said: "well, you did not deny it".

Of course I did not deny it, how can I deny something I know
nothing
about? He may as well have said I didn't deny the Roswell landing
and
alien abductions.

Immediately after what is referenced to me without quoting, he
puts a
quote which claims this even more vehemently. He then attributed it
to
someone else at the end of the paragraph almost as an
after-thought:

    "While it is clear Israel has successfully used cyber-tactics
against its enemies, it is harder to know to what extent Israel has
been
hit, according to Dahan. "

I don't know where Dahan comes up with his facts, but I my alarm
bells
should have ringed when the repoter, Mr. Harris, asked me about
silly
rumored conspiracy theories against the US government--they were so
ridiculous I don't even remember what they were.

Was this reporter just looking for a hit story, no matter if
unsubstantiated and unprofessional, or is this some sort of agenda?

This is trickery of the lowest sort, and yellow journalism if I've
ever
seen such. Unless it was an honest mistake on the reporter's part--
in
which case I hope this is fixed soon.

You can find his article, here:
http://news.xinhuanet.com/english/2009-07/15/content_11709201.htm

   Gadi.




--
Gadi Evron,
ge () linuxbox org.

Blog: http://gevron.livejournal.com/
_______________________________________________
Fun and Misc security discussion for OT posts.
https://linuxbox.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/funsec
Note: funsec is a public and open mailing list.

_______________________________________________
Fun and Misc security discussion for OT posts.
https://linuxbox.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/funsec
Note: funsec is a public and open mailing list.

_______________________________________________
Fun and Misc security discussion for OT posts.
https://linuxbox.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/funsec
Note: funsec is a public and open mailing list.


Current thread: