funsec mailing list archives
Re: Project Grey Goose Paper Released
From: freed0 <freed0 () shadowserver org>
Date: Thu, 16 Oct 2008 20:57:52 -0700
If was just for an 'executive' over view, it too much technical detail. Most 'in' the security field knew most of this. We have all been discussing it for a while. But yes, not knowing the intended audience does hamper my opinion. Although the way it was talked up before release implied that they would have something wonderful at *our* level, and that was not the case. Richard Paul Ferguson wrote:
Can you explain to me exactly _who_ already knows this? You? Yes. Me? Yes. Anybody else? :-) - ferg On Thu, Oct 16, 2008 at 7:39 PM, freed0 <freed0 () shadowserver org> wrote:Sorry, it is very pretty and adds absolutely no value to what we already know. It is a lot of very basic effort that could have been generated in the first days of the 'attacks' What is the target audience supposed to be? Richard Paul Ferguson wrote:FYI: http://intelfusion.net/wordpress/?p=432 - ferg
_______________________________________________ Fun and Misc security discussion for OT posts. https://linuxbox.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/funsec Note: funsec is a public and open mailing list.
Current thread:
- Project Grey Goose Paper Released Paul Ferguson (Oct 16)
- Re: Project Grey Goose Paper Released freed0 (Oct 16)
- Re: Project Grey Goose Paper Released Paul Ferguson (Oct 16)
- Re: Project Grey Goose Paper Released Paul Ferguson (Oct 16)
- Re: Project Grey Goose Paper Released freed0 (Oct 16)
- Re: Project Grey Goose Paper Released Paul Ferguson (Oct 16)
- Re: Project Grey Goose Paper Released freed0 (Oct 16)