funsec mailing list archives
Re: Anyone have opinions on today's FISA news?
From: Rich Kulawiec <rsk () gsp org>
Date: Mon, 23 Jun 2008 14:12:32 -0400
On Sat, Jun 21, 2008 at 05:52:14PM -0700, Jarrod Frates wrote:
According to the Supreme Court decision in Calder v. Bull (1798), the ex post facto prohibition applies only to criminal law, not civil law.
Thanks for providing this and the subsequent explanation. I haven't read that decision yet -- but I will now. It seems to provide a lot of the context necessary to understand this issue, so I'm grateful for the pointer. ---Rsk _______________________________________________ Fun and Misc security discussion for OT posts. https://linuxbox.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/funsec Note: funsec is a public and open mailing list.
Current thread:
- Anyone have opinions on today's FISA news? Chris Blask (Jun 20)
- Re: Anyone have opinions on today's FISA news? Rich Kulawiec (Jun 21)
- Re: Anyone have opinions on today's FISA news? Jarrod Frates (Jun 21)
- Re: Anyone have opinions on today's FISA news? Rich Kulawiec (Jun 23)
- Re: Anyone have opinions on today's FISA news? Jarrod Frates (Jun 21)
- Re: Anyone have opinions on today's FISA news? Rich Kulawiec (Jun 21)