funsec mailing list archives
Re: Silverlight 2 vs AIR
From: "Richard M. Smith" <rms () computerbytesman com>
Date: Mon, 25 Feb 2008 18:40:56 -0500
Just briefly. During the beta, I found a buffer overflow error in the Silverlight ActiveX control which Microsoft fixed. Richard -----Original Message----- From: funsec-bounces () linuxbox org [mailto:funsec-bounces () linuxbox org] On Behalf Of Rob, grandpa of Ryan, Trevor, Devon & Hannah Sent: Monday, February 25, 2008 6:26 PM To: funsec () linuxbox org Subject: Re: [funsec] Silverlight 2 vs AIR Date sent: Mon, 25 Feb 2008 13:25:01 -0500 From: rms () computerbytesman com
Silverlight looks a lot more interesting from a security prospective than AIR since Silverlight applications run inside of a browser..
Has anyone looked at Silverlight in security detail? I've already run across a site that wouldn't let me see anything since I didn't have it ... ====================== (quote inserted randomly by Pegasus Mailer) rslade () vcn bc ca slade () victoria tc ca rslade () computercrime org She's totally round the bend. But perhaps she gets a better view from there. - `Johnny and the Bomb,' Terry Pratchett http://victoria.tc.ca/techrev/rms.htm _______________________________________________ Fun and Misc security discussion for OT posts. https://linuxbox.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/funsec Note: funsec is a public and open mailing list. _______________________________________________ Fun and Misc security discussion for OT posts. https://linuxbox.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/funsec Note: funsec is a public and open mailing list.
Current thread:
- Silverlight 2 vs AIR rms (Feb 25)
- Re: Silverlight 2 vs AIR Rob, grandpa of Ryan, Trevor, Devon & Hannah (Feb 25)
- Re: Silverlight 2 vs AIR Richard M. Smith (Feb 25)
- Re: Silverlight 2 vs AIR security curmudgeon (Feb 25)
- Re: Silverlight 2 vs AIR Richard M. Smith (Feb 25)
- Re: Silverlight 2 vs AIR Richard M. Smith (Feb 25)
- Re: Silverlight 2 vs AIR Rob, grandpa of Ryan, Trevor, Devon & Hannah (Feb 25)