funsec mailing list archives

Re: Incompetence, Ignorance or just plain stupidity?


From: Valdis.Kletnieks () vt edu
Date: Mon, 21 Jan 2008 20:56:12 -0500

On Mon, 21 Jan 2008 23:53:46 GMT, Jim Murray said:
Now call me naive, but any business who's employees managed to loose 
that many laptops in 4 years would surely be asking some very serious 
questions about it's IT policy.

All depends on the size of the business.  If the place has 100 employees,
that works out to one per year per employee, and questions *should* be
asked.  Where I work is closer to 10,000 employees, and that's a 1% loss
rate - still high, but not *that* outrageous.  If you're talking about
the Ministry of Defense, which is big enough that one of the lost data
files was for 153,000 *applicants* for jobs, it's down in the noise.

You are however correct that ideally, measures would be in place so that
if a laptop does go walkies, recovery would be a simple "Oh darn, get another
one off the shelf, image it, restore files from backup server, and get on
with productive work".

Surely it's time encrypting hard drives became standard on ALL laptops?

The problem is that devising a scheme that encrypts the hard drive in such a
manner that the legitimate user is able to handle starting up the encryption,
but the thief in possession of a stolen one isn't able to start it up.  That's
where many "hardware encrypted disks" fall short - they work *well* in
preventing access to data if the disk is plugged into a machine other than
its intended one, but that loses if it's still in the laptop it's intended for.

Attachment: _bin
Description:

_______________________________________________
Fun and Misc security discussion for OT posts.
https://linuxbox.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/funsec
Note: funsec is a public and open mailing list.

Current thread: