funsec mailing list archives
Re: Shocker: DKIM antispam standard can't stop spam
From: Valdis.Kletnieks () vt edu
Date: Fri, 13 Jul 2007 16:46:42 -0400
On Fri, 13 Jul 2007 16:37:02 EDT, Dude VanWinkle said:
So if you have 1,000,000 spam a day at 50KB per spam and you have to pay for the bandwidth, backing them up to tape and disk, added to the expansion of email storage (one of the most expensive types IMO) It still isnt worth it to list every server who can send out mail from your domain? Maybe the returns dont match the investment, I dont have the numbers to run the math..
It *would* be, if a fraction of the spam we got had vt.edu source addresses. But *we* don't filter out very much spam by listing what places can send with vt.edu addresses. *OTHER* places can filter any spam that shows up with a 'From: vt.edu' on it. But publishing vt.edu doesn't do *squat* for our filtering spam that has some *OTHER* domain in the From: - we only get *that* benefit if the purported source domain publishes *their* info. To run it by once more - we publish, gmail gets the benefit. Gmail publishes, *we* get the benefit. Nobody gets the benefit *themselves* by publishing.
Attachment:
_bin
Description:
_______________________________________________ Fun and Misc security discussion for OT posts. https://linuxbox.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/funsec Note: funsec is a public and open mailing list.
Current thread:
- Shocker: DKIM antispam standard can't stop spam Paul Ferguson (Jul 12)
- Re: Shocker: DKIM antispam standard can't stop spam Dude VanWinkle (Jul 13)
- RE: Shocker: DKIM antispam standard can't stop spam Larry Seltzer (Jul 13)
- Re: Shocker: DKIM antispam standard can't stop spam Valdis . Kletnieks (Jul 13)
- Re: Shocker: DKIM antispam standard can't stop spam Dude VanWinkle (Jul 13)
- Re: Shocker: DKIM antispam standard can't stop spam Valdis . Kletnieks (Jul 13)
- Re: Shocker: DKIM antispam standard can't stop spam Dude VanWinkle (Jul 13)
- Re: Shocker: DKIM antispam standard can't stop spam Valdis . Kletnieks (Jul 13)
- Re: Shocker: DKIM antispam standard can't stop spam Nick FitzGerald (Jul 13)
- Re: Shocker: DKIM antispam standard can't stop spam Dude VanWinkle (Jul 13)
- Re: Shocker: DKIM antispam standard can't stop spam Paul Vixie (Jul 13)
- Re: Shocker: DKIM antispam standard can't stop spam Nick FitzGerald (Jul 13)
- Re: Shocker: DKIM antispam standard can't stop spam John Payne (Jul 15)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: Shocker: DKIM antispam standard can't stop spam Paul Ferguson (Jul 13)
- Re: Shocker: DKIM antispam standard can't stop spam Paul Ferguson (Jul 13)
- Re: Shocker: DKIM antispam standard can't stop spam Dude VanWinkle (Jul 13)
- Re: Shocker: DKIM antispam standard can't stop spam Dude VanWinkle (Jul 13)
- Re: Shocker: DKIM antispam standard can't stop spam Dude VanWinkle (Jul 13)